• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《十项人格量表的土耳其语改编版》

The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.

作者信息

Atak Hasan

机构信息

Kırıkkale University Faculty of Education, Division of Educational Sciences, Department of PCG, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

DOI:10.4274/npa.y6128
PMID:28360563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5363422/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Personality is one of the important domains of psychology, and it is an integration of emotional, cognitive, social and physical properties. In this study, we aimed to assess the applicability of the "Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)" which measures five basic personality traits in Turkish young people.

METHOD

Data from a total of 420 participants - 208 male (49.1%) and 212 female (50.9%) - were employed for the validity and reliability analyses. Of the participants, 230 (54,8%; mean age: 23.2 years; sd=1.6) were university students and the rest were not (n=190; 45.2%; mean age: 23.4 years; df=1.7). The mean age of the participants was 22.1 years (df=1.3), ranging from 18 to 25 years.

RESULTS

Language validity (correlations between 0.92 and 0.97), exploratory factor analysis yielded 10 items and five-factor model explaining 65.21% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analyses (χ/df: 2.20, GFI=0.95, AGFI=0.92, CFI=0.93, NNFI=0.91, RMR=0.04, and RMSEA=0.03), item analysis, and convergent validity results indicated that a five-factor solution with 10 items met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit among Turkish young people. The internal consistency (Openness to Experiences 0.83, Agreeableness 0.81, Emotional Stability 0.83, Conscientiousness 0.84, and Extraversion 0.86) and test-retest stability (=54; Openness to Experiences 0.89, Agreeableness 0.87, Emotional Stability 0.89, Conscientiousness 0.87, and Extraversion 0.88) revealed a moderate to acceptable reliabilities.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that the TIPI could be used in studies that evaluate personality in Turkish young people.

摘要

引言

人格是心理学的重要领域之一,它是情感、认知、社会和身体属性的整合。在本研究中,我们旨在评估“十项人格量表(TIPI)”在土耳其年轻人中测量五种基本人格特质的适用性。

方法

共有420名参与者的数据——208名男性(49.1%)和212名女性(50.9%)——用于效度和信度分析。参与者中,230名(54.8%;平均年龄:23.2岁;标准差=1.6)是大学生,其余不是(n=190;45.2%;平均年龄:23.4岁;标准差=1.7)。参与者的平均年龄为22.1岁(标准差=1.3),年龄范围为18至25岁。

结果

语言效度(相关性在(0.92)至(0.97)之间)方面,探索性因素分析得出10个项目和五因素模型,解释了65.21%的方差。验证性因素分析(卡方/自由度:2.20,拟合优度指数=0.95,调整拟合优度指数=0.92,比较拟合指数=0.93,非规范拟合指数=0.91,残差均方根=0.04,近似误差均方根=0.03)、项目分析和聚合效度结果表明,一个包含10个项目的五因素解决方案符合土耳其年轻人中拟合充分性的标准。内部一致性(经验开放性0.83,宜人性0.81,情绪稳定性0.83,尽责性0.84,外向性0.86)和重测稳定性((n=54);经验开放性0.89,宜人性0.87,情绪稳定性0.89,尽责性0.87,外向性0.88)显示出中等至可接受的信度。

结论

结果表明,TIPI可用于评估土耳其年轻人人格的研究。

相似文献

1
The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.《十项人格量表的土耳其语改编版》
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
2
Examination of Psychometric Properties of the Need for Closure Scale-Short Form among Turkish College Students.土耳其大学生中闭合需要量表简版的心理测量特性检验
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2017 Jun;54(2):175-182. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.12707. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
6
Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
7
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
8
[Normative data of middle-aged and older Japanese adults for the the Japanese version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)].[日本版十项人格量表(TIPI-J)的日本中老年成年人常模数据]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(7):356-363. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.7_356.
9
The Big Five personality dimensions and mental health: The mediating role of alexithymia.大五人格维度与心理健康:述情障碍的中介作用。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Dec;24:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish Adaptation of the Ghosting Questionnaire and Its Impact on Relationship Satisfaction: Serial Mediation Effects of Negative Affect and Loneliness.《幽灵问卷》的土耳其语改编版及其对关系满意度的影响:消极情绪和孤独感的系列中介效应
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 May 7;15(5):71. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15050071.
2
Psychological effects of psychedelics in adolescents.迷幻药对青少年的心理影响。
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 7;3:1364617. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1364617. eCollection 2024.
3
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties.十项人格量表(TIPI):关于版本、翻译及心理测量特性的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1202953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. eCollection 2023.
4
Structural Equation Model of Personality Traits, Psychopathology, and Nonverbal Immediacy Behavior.人格特质、精神病理学与非言语即时行为的结构方程模型
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 19;22(1):19-24. doi: 10.5455/apd.16251. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Sarcasm use in Turkish: The roles of personality, age, gender, and self-esteem.土耳其的讽刺语使用:人格、年龄、性别和自尊的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0276073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276073. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample.从 10 岁到 65 岁的人格特质的年龄差异:大五人格领域和方面在一个大型的横断面样本中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Feb;100(2):330-48. doi: 10.1037/a0021717.
2
The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):431-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.431.
3
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.跨工具和观察者的人格五因素模型的验证
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):81-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.81.
4
Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.大五人格与环形模型方法在特质结构研究中的整合
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Jul;63(1):146-63. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.146.