Woolfrey B F, Ramadei W A, Quall C O
Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;70(3):337-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/70.3.337.
Four hundred thirteen clinical isolates of fluorescent pseudomonads consisting of 286 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 127 organisms of the Pseudomonas fluorescent group were tested for susceptibilities to gentamicin by the broth-dilution method and by the standardized disk agar-diffusion test, using Mueller-Hinton agar from three sources. Different regression lines and significantly different mean inhibition zone diameters were found for the three Mueller-Hinton agars. Single zone-diameter breakpoints of either 13 or 16 mm for the standardized disk agar-diffusion test produced unacceptable rates of false-sensitive and false-resistant interpretations. When error rates were limited by using zone-diameter breakpoints determined by the method of error rate-bound analysis, the percentage of indeterminate interpretations became so large as to make the standardized disk agar-diffusion test impractical. It is concluded that the standardized disk agar-diffusion test should not be used for testing susceptibility of the fluorescent pseudomonads to gentamicin, and presumably other aminoglycosides.
采用肉汤稀释法和标准化纸片琼脂扩散试验,使用来自三个来源的穆勒-欣顿琼脂,对413株荧光假单胞菌临床分离株进行庆大霉素敏感性测试,其中包括286株铜绿假单胞菌和127株荧光假单胞菌属的菌株。发现三种穆勒-欣顿琼脂的回归线不同,平均抑菌圈直径也有显著差异。标准化纸片琼脂扩散试验中,13或16mm的单抑菌圈直径断点产生了不可接受的假敏感和假耐药解释率。当通过错误率界限分析方法确定的抑菌圈直径断点来限制错误率时,不确定解释的百分比变得如此之大,以至于标准化纸片琼脂扩散试验变得不切实际。结论是,标准化纸片琼脂扩散试验不应再用于检测荧光假单胞菌对庆大霉素以及可能对其他氨基糖苷类药物的敏感性。