• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何变革计划无法带来改变。

Why change programs don't produce change.

作者信息

Beer M, Eisenstat R A, Spector B

机构信息

Harvard Business School.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1990 Nov-Dec;68(6):158-66.

PMID:10107960
Abstract

Faced with changing markets and tougher competition, more and more companies realize that to compete effectively they must transform how they function. But while senior managers understand the necessity of change, they often misunderstand what it takes to bring it about. They assume that corporate renewal is the product of company-wide change programs and that in order to transform employee behavior, they must alter a company's formal structure and systems. Both these assumptions are wrong, say these authors. Using examples drawn from their four-year study of organizational change at six large corporations, they argue that change programs are, in fact, the greatest obstacle to successful revitalization and that formal structures and systems are the last thing a company should change, not the first. The most successful change efforts begin at the periphery of a corporation, in a single plant or division. Such efforts are led by general managers, not the CEO or corporate staff people. And these general managers concentrate not on changing formal structures and systems but on creating ad hoc organizational arrangements to solve concrete business problems. This focuses energy for change on the work itself, not on abstractions such as "participation" or "culture." Once general managers understand the importance of this grass-roots approach to change, they don't have to wait for senior management to start a process of corporate renewal. The authors describe a six-step change process they call the "critical path."

摘要

面对不断变化的市场和日益激烈的竞争,越来越多的公司意识到,要想有效竞争,就必须改变自身的运作方式。然而,尽管高级管理人员明白变革的必要性,但他们往往误解了实现变革所需的条件。他们认为企业复兴是全公司变革计划的产物,并且为了改变员工行为,必须改变公司的正式结构和制度。这些作者表示,这两个假设都是错误的。他们通过对六家大公司为期四年的组织变革研究中所举的例子,认为变革计划实际上是成功复兴的最大障碍,而正式结构和制度是公司最不应首先改变的,而应是最后才改变的。最成功的变革努力始于公司的边缘,在单个工厂或部门。这些努力由总经理领导,而非首席执行官或公司员工。而且这些总经理关注的不是改变正式结构和制度,而是创建临时的组织安排来解决具体的业务问题。这将变革的精力集中在工作本身,而非诸如“参与”或“文化”等抽象概念上。一旦总经理理解了这种基层变革方法的重要性,他们不必等待高层管理人员启动企业复兴进程。作者描述了一个他们称之为“关键路径”的六步变革过程。

相似文献

1
Why change programs don't produce change.为何变革计划无法带来改变。
Harv Bus Rev. 1990 Nov-Dec;68(6):158-66.
2
The CEO as organizational architect: an interview with Xerox's Paul Allaire. Interview by Robert Howard.首席执行官作为组织架构师:对施乐公司的保罗·阿莱尔的访谈。罗伯特·霍华德采访。
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 Sep-Oct;70(5):106-21.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Corporate redemption and the seven deadly sins.公司赎回与七宗罪。
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 May-Jun;70(3):65-75.
5
Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind.矩阵管理:并非一种结构,而是一种思维模式。
Harv Bus Rev. 1990 Jul-Aug;68(4):138-45.
6
The new boundaries of the "boundaryless" company.“无边界”公司的新边界。
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 May-Jun;70(3):104-15.
7
Making strategy: learning by doing.制定策略:边做边学。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Nov-Dec;75(6):141-6, 148-56.
8
Welcome aboard (but don't change a thing).欢迎登机(但无需做出任何改变)。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Oct;80(10):32-5; discussion 36-40, 127.
9
Interpretive management: what general managers can learn from design.
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Mar-Apr;76(2):86-96.
10
Growing talent as if your business depended on it.培养人才,就好像你的事业依赖于此一样。
Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Oct;83(10):62-70, 155.

引用本文的文献

1
Change management for services redesign in healthcare: a conceptual framework.医疗保健服务重新设计中的变革管理:一个概念框架。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Oct 31;65(3):E410-E433. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.3.3023. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
What is best for Esther? A simple question that moves mindsets and improves care.埃丝特最好的选择是什么?一个简单的问题,却能改变思维模式,改善护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09870-1.
3
Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management.激励主动生物风险管理。
Health Secur. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):46-60. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0101. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
An e-leadership training academy for practicing clinicians in primary care and public health settings.一个面向基层医疗和公共卫生领域执业临床医生的电子领导力培训学院。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan 5;5(1):e83. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.574.
5
Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees.探索一种旨在预防未来长期病假的针对性预防策略的预期和感知到的促进因素及障碍;一项针对雇主和雇员的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10322-w.
6
Coming Full Circle: How Health Worker Motivation and Performance in Results-Based Financing Arrangements Hinges on Strong and Adaptive Health Systems.回到原点:基于成果的融资安排中卫生工作者的激励和绩效如何取决于强大且适应性强的卫生系统。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):101-111. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.98.
7
Collaborative modeling of an implementation strategy: a case study to integrate health promotion in primary and community care.一项实施策略的协作建模:将健康促进纳入初级和社区护理的案例研究
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 6;10(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3040-8.
8
Modelling innovative interventions for optimising healthy lifestyle promotion in primary health care: "prescribe Vida Saludable" phase I research protocol.在初级卫生保健中为优化健康生活方式推广建立创新干预措施的模型:“开出健康生活处方”第一阶段研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 18;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-103.
9
Redirecting traditional professional values to support safety: changing organisational culture in health care.重新引导传统专业价值观以支持安全:改变医疗保健领域的组织文化。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii16-21. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_2.ii16.
10
Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change.开发并测试一个用于预测组织变革结果的模型。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Apr;38(2):751-76. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00143.