Kelner M J, Bourgeault I L, Wahl J A
Department of Behavioural Science, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Death Stud. 1994 Mar-Apr;18(2):167-81. doi: 10.1080/07481189408252649.
Because of radical changes that have been effected by medical advances in the process of dying, it is now frequently necessary for patients to make an explicit decision on whether to forego life-prolonging medical therapies. We report physicians' and nurses' perceptions of the need for, feasibility of, and value of regulations and legislation to govern the dying process. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of 20 physicians and 20 nurses at a large teaching hospital. There was little unanimity in their attitudes toward whether it is advisable or feasible to devise adequate legal safeguards for physicians and nurses who assist patients to hasten their deaths. Some believed such regulations were needed, but others believed they would seriously compromise good patient care. There was also disagreement as to who should develop guidelines. There was, however, clear opposition among most participants to the involvement of lawyers in the process of clarifying the content of regulations and legislation on the dying process.
由于在临终过程中医疗进步带来了根本性变化,现在患者常常需要就是否放弃延长生命的医疗治疗做出明确决定。我们报告了医生和护士对于管理临终过程的法规和立法的必要性、可行性及价值的看法。我们在一家大型教学医院对20名医生和20名护士进行了深入的半结构化访谈。对于为协助患者加速死亡的医生和护士制定适当法律保障措施是否明智或可行,他们的态度几乎没有一致之处。一些人认为需要这样的法规,但另一些人认为这会严重损害良好的患者护理。对于应由谁来制定指导方针也存在分歧。然而,大多数参与者明确反对律师参与阐明临终过程法规和立法内容的过程。