Taylor F C, Ramsay M E, Tan G, Gabbay J, Cohen H
St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.
Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):79-85. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.79.
To develop a questionnaire to evaluate patients' knowledge of anticoagulation.
Anonymous self completed questionnaire study based on hospital anticoagulant guidelines.
Anticoagulant clinic in a 580 bed district general hospital in London.
70 consecutive patients newly referred to the anticoagulant clinic over six months.
Information received by patients on six items of anticoagulation counselling (mode of action of warfarin, adverse effects of over or under anticoagulation, drugs to avoid, action if bleeding or bruising occurs, and alcohol consumption), the source of such information, and patients' knowledge about anticoagulation.
Of the recruits, 36 (51%) were male; 38(54%) were aged below 46 years, 22(31%) 46-60, and 10(14%) over 75. 50 (71%) questionnaires were returned. In all, 40 respondents spoke English at home and six another language. Most patients reported being clearly advised on five of the six items, but knowledge about anticoagulation was poor. Few patients could correctly identify adverse conditions associated with poor control of anticoagulation: bleeding was identified by only 30(60%), bruising by 23(56%), and thrombosis by 18(36%). Only 26(52%) patients could identify an excessive level of alcohol consumption, and only seven (14%) could identify three or more self prescribed agents which may interfere with warfarin.
The questionnaire provided a simple method of determining patients' knowledge of anticoagulation, and its results indicated that this requires improvement.
Patients' responses suggested that advice was not always given by medical staff, and use of counselling checklists is recommended. Reinforcement of advice by non-medical counsellors and with educational guides such as posters or leaflets should be considered. Such initiatives are currently being evaluated in a repeat survey.
编制一份问卷以评估患者对抗凝治疗的了解程度。
基于医院抗凝指南的匿名自填式问卷调查研究。
伦敦一家拥有580张床位的区综合医院的抗凝门诊。
连续6个月新转诊至抗凝门诊的70例患者。
患者收到的关于六项抗凝咨询内容(华法林的作用方式、抗凝过度或不足的不良反应、避免使用的药物、出血或瘀伤发生时的处理措施以及饮酒情况)的信息、该信息的来源以及患者对抗凝治疗的了解情况。
招募的患者中,36例(51%)为男性;38例(54%)年龄在46岁以下,22例(31%)年龄在46 - 60岁,10例(14%)年龄超过75岁。共收回50份(71%)问卷。总体而言,40名受访者在家说英语,6名说其他语言。大多数患者表示在六项内容中的五项得到了明确的建议,但对抗凝治疗的了解程度较差。很少有患者能正确识别与抗凝控制不佳相关的不良情况:只有30例(60%)识别出出血,23例(56%)识别出瘀伤,18例(36%)识别出血栓形成。只有26例(52%)患者能识别过量饮酒,只有7例(14%)能识别出三种或更多可能干扰华法林作用的自行服用药物。
该问卷提供了一种确定患者对抗凝治疗了解程度的简单方法,其结果表明这方面需要改进。
患者的回答表明医务人员并非总是给予建议,建议使用咨询检查表。应考虑由非医务人员通过海报或传单等教育指南加强建议。目前正在通过重复调查对这些举措进行评估。