• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者是医疗服务质量的核心。

The patient as the pivot point for quality in health care delivery.

作者信息

Lengnick-Hall C A

机构信息

W. Frank Barton School of Business, Wichita State University, KS 67260, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):25-39.

PMID:10140872
Abstract

Health care enterprises make comprehensive and durable changes in people. This human-centered purpose defines the fundamental nature of quality in health care settings. Traditional perspectives of quality and familiar views of customer satisfaction are inadequate to manage the complex relationships between the health care delivery firm and its patients. Patients play four roles in health care systems that must be reflected when defining and measuring quality in these settings: patient as supplier, patient as product, patient as participant, and patient as recipient. This article presents a conceptual model of quality that incorporates these diverse patient roles. The strategic and managerial implications of the model are also discussed.

摘要

医疗保健企业会对人们产生全面而持久的影响。这种以人 为中心的目标定义了医疗保健环境中质量的基本性质。传统的质量观和常见的客户满意度观点不足以管理医疗保健服务公司与其患者之间的复杂关系。患者在医疗保健系统中扮演四个角色,在定义和衡量这些环境中的质量时必须予以体现:患者作为供应商、患者作为产品、患者作为参与者以及患者作为接受者。本文提出了一个包含这些不同患者角色的质量概念模型。还讨论了该模型的战略和管理意义。

相似文献

1
The patient as the pivot point for quality in health care delivery.患者是医疗服务质量的核心。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):25-39.
2
Health management information system: a tool to gauge patient satisfaction and quality of care.健康管理信息系统:一种衡量患者满意度和医疗质量的工具。
East Mediterr Health J. 2005 Jan-Mar;11(1-2):192-8.
3
Ensuring a customer-focused experience: two success stories.确保以客户为中心的体验:两个成功案例。
Healthc Exec. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):18-23.
4
The role of total quality management in patient-centered restructuring.全面质量管理在以患者为中心的重组中的作用。
J Soc Health Syst. 1995;5(1):63-71.
5
Current pulse: can a production system reduce medical errors in health care?当前脉冲:生产系统能否减少医疗保健中的医疗差错?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Jul-Sep;16(3):226-38. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000281059.30355.76.
6
Good fortune. Griffin Hospital gets outstanding grades in both employee and patient satisfaction.运气真好。格里芬医院在员工满意度和患者满意度方面都获得了优异成绩。
Trustee. 2001 Jul;54(7):20-4, 1.
7
Keeping an eye on a moving target: quality changes and challenges for nurses.关注移动目标:护士面临的质量变化与挑战
Nurs Econ. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6):258-65, 290.
8
Customer satisfaction in the emergency department.急诊科的患者满意度
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Feb;22(1):87-102. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00121-4.
9
Customer information and the quality improvement process: developing a customer information system.
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1992 Summer;37(2):197-212.
10
Patient-centered care: understanding its interpretation and implementation in health care.以患者为中心的护理:理解其在医疗保健中的诠释与实施。
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 2000 Summer;14(2):165-83; discussion 183-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient involvement in quality improvement: a survey comparing naturalistic and reflective approaches.患者参与质量改进:自然主义与反思方法比较调查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001981.
2
Barriers and facilitators to changing bowel care practices after spinal cord injury: a Theoretical Domains Framework approach.脊髓损伤后改变肠道护理实践的障碍和促进因素:理论领域框架方法。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00743-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Quality Evaluation of Health Services Using the Kano Model in Two Hospitals in Peru.
采用卡诺模型对秘鲁两家医院的卫生服务质量进行评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(11):6159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116159.
4
Parental Satisfaction with Pediatric Day-Care Surgery and its Determinants in a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院中家长对小儿日间手术的满意度及其影响因素
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;22(4):226-231. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_212_16.