Suppr超能文献

纵向公平:对结果进行加权?还是确立程序?

Vertical equity: weighting outcomes? or establishing procedures?

作者信息

Mooney G, Jan S

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Health Policy. 1997 Jan;39(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(96)00851-2.

Abstract

Considerations of equity in the health policy literature have in the main focussed on horizontal equity (the equal treatment of equals) and as a consequence have tended to overlook vertical equity (the unequal, but equitable, treatment of unequals). There is evidence from earlier, if preliminary, work carried out by the authors and a colleague that health care decision makers may well want to embrace concerns for vertical equity in the allocation of health service resources. This paper examines some possibilities for incorporating vertical equity into health care policy through distributive and/or procedural justice. While no firm solutions are offered, it is suggested that the idea of fitting John Broome's notion of 'claims' within a communitarian framework holds promise.

摘要

卫生政策文献中的公平性考量主要集中在横向公平(平等对待平等者)上,因此往往忽视了纵向公平(不平等者得到不平等但公平的对待)。作者及其一位同事早期开展的初步研究表明,医疗保健决策者很可能希望在卫生服务资源分配中关注纵向公平。本文探讨了通过分配正义和/或程序正义将纵向公平纳入医疗保健政策的一些可能性。虽然没有提供确定的解决方案,但有人认为,将约翰·布鲁姆的“诉求”概念置于社群主义框架内的想法具有前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验