Mooney G
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(3):203-15. doi: 10.1023/A:1009439917796.
This paper introduces this mini-series on vertical equity in health care. It reflects on the fact that by and large equity policies in health care have failed and that there is a need for positive discrimination to promote equity better in future. This positive discrimination is examined under the heading of 'vertical equity'. The paper considers Varian's notion of 'envy' as a basis for equity in health care but concludes that this is not a helpful route to go down. Better it would seem to pursue the idea from Sen of 'freedoms' and 'communitarian claims' (as raised previously by this author). While it is argued that procedural justice is to be preferred in the longer run as a basis for equity there are gains in adopting a short run goal of promoting distributive justice. Some preliminary evidence is presented on the weighting of health gains to reflect such vertical equity concerns.
本文介绍了关于医疗保健垂直公平的这个迷你系列文章。它反思了这样一个事实,即总体而言,医疗保健方面的公平政策已经失败,并且未来需要积极的差别对待以更好地促进公平。这种积极的差别对待在“垂直公平”这一标题下进行探讨。本文考虑了将瓦里安的“嫉妒”概念作为医疗保健公平的基础,但得出结论认为这不是一条有益的途径。似乎更好的做法是遵循森提出的“自由”和“社群主义主张”的理念(此前作者也曾提出过)。虽然有人认为从长远来看,程序正义作为公平的基础更可取,但采用促进分配正义的短期目标也有好处。本文给出了一些初步证据,说明如何权衡健康收益以反映此类垂直公平问题。