• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定病情的性能信息:评估突出性、理解情况以及传达质量的方法。

Condition-specific performance information: assessing salience, comprehension, and approaches for communicating quality.

作者信息

Hibbard J H, Sofaer S, Jewett J J

机构信息

University of Oregon, Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management, Eugene 97401, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):95-109.

PMID:10165040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193618/
Abstract

This study assesses how consumers view condition-specific performance measures and builds on an earlier study to test an approach for communicating quality information. The study uses three separate designs: a small experiment, a cross-sectional analysis of survey data, and focus groups. We test whether providing information on the health care context affects consumer understanding of indicators. Focus groups were used to explore how consumers view performance measures. The cross-sectional survey analysis used survey data from the experiment and the focus groups to look at comprehension and the salience of condition-specific performance measures. Findings show that a general consumer population does view condition-specific performance measures as salient. Further, the findings provide evidence that information on the health care context makes a difference in how consumers understand performance measures.

摘要

本研究评估了消费者如何看待特定病情的绩效指标,并在早期研究的基础上测试一种传达质量信息的方法。该研究采用了三种不同的设计:一个小型实验、对调查数据的横截面分析以及焦点小组。我们测试了提供医疗保健背景信息是否会影响消费者对指标的理解。焦点小组用于探究消费者如何看待绩效指标。横截面调查分析使用了来自实验和焦点小组的调查数据,以考察对特定病情绩效指标的理解和显著性。研究结果表明,一般消费者群体确实认为特定病情的绩效指标很重要。此外,研究结果还证明,医疗保健背景信息对消费者理解绩效指标的方式有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4969/4193618/fd343dbd3249/hcfr-18-1-95-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4969/4193618/fd343dbd3249/hcfr-18-1-95-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4969/4193618/fd343dbd3249/hcfr-18-1-95-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Condition-specific performance information: assessing salience, comprehension, and approaches for communicating quality.特定病情的性能信息:评估突出性、理解情况以及传达质量的方法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):95-109.
2
Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice.消费者对健康计划选择信息需求的看法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):55-73.
3
Comprehension of quality care indicators: differences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured.对优质护理指标的理解:私人保险、公共保险和未参保人群之间的差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):75-94.
4
What type of quality information do consumers want in a health care report card?消费者在医疗保健成绩单中想要哪种类型的质量信息?
Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Mar;53(1):28-47. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300102.
5
Will quality report cards help consumers?质量报告卡对消费者有帮助吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 May-Jun;16(3):218-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.218.
6
What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care.质量到底是什么?绩效报告能向消费者清楚地传达护理质量的含义。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Jun;67(3):275-93. doi: 10.1177/1077558709356300. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
7
What does it all mean? Making sense of health plan data.这一切意味着什么?理解健康计划数据。
Mod Healthc. 1998 Apr 20;28(16):98-106.
8
Role of consumer information in today's health care system.消费者信息在当今医疗保健系统中的作用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):1-8.
9
Consumer health information. What the research is telling us.消费者健康信息。研究告诉我们的内容。
Aust Fam Physician. 2001 Nov;30(11):1108-12.
10
'Road maps' more practical right now than 'report cards'.
Mod Healthc. 1994 Nov 7;24(45):56, 58.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of public reporting of prescription indicators on patient choices: evidence from propensity scores matching.处方指标公开报告对患者选择的影响:倾向得分匹配法的证据
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1110653. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1110653. eCollection 2023.
2
Social Care Insurance: A Review of Psychological Influences on Uptake.社会护理保险:对参保率的心理影响综述
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:564471. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.564471. eCollection 2020.
3
Certificate-Of-Need Regulation and Healthcare Service Quality: Evidence from the Nursing Home Industry.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehension of quality care indicators: differences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured.对优质护理指标的理解:私人保险、公共保险和未参保人群之间的差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):75-94.
2
What type of quality information do consumers want in a health care report card?消费者在医疗保健成绩单中想要哪种类型的质量信息?
Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Mar;53(1):28-47. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300102.
3
An analysis of the choice of health benefits plans.
Inquiry. 1980 Spring;17(1):62-71.
需求证明监管与医疗服务质量:来自养老院行业的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;8(4):423. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040423.
4
A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.患者选择外科医生所依据因素的系统评价
World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3246-7.
5
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.公开绩效数据对改变医疗保健消费者、专业人员或组织的行为所产生的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub2.
6
Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement within the UK.救护车服务在紧急呼叫中命中和未命中目标的情况:英国不同绩效衡量系统的影响
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):161-190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00557.x.
7
Achieving improvement through nursing home quality measurement.通过疗养院质量评估实现改善。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):5-18.
8
Creating more effective health plan quality reports for consumers: lessons from a synthesis of qualitative testing.为消费者创建更有效的健康计划质量报告:定性测试综合分析的经验教训
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):447-76.
9
Measuring the "managedness" and covered benefits of health plans.衡量健康保险计划的“管理程度”和涵盖福利。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):707-34.
10
Challenges for the public in negotiating the health system in the 21st century.21世纪公众在应对卫生系统方面面临的挑战。
J Urban Health. 1999 Jun;76(2):211-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02344677.
4
Designing health insurance information for the Medicare beneficiary: a policy synthesis.为医疗保险受益人设计健康保险信息:一项政策综述。
Health Serv Res. 1988 Dec;23(5):685-720.
5
A study guided by the Health Belief Model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older.一项由健康信念模型为指导,针对40岁及以上女性乳腺癌筛查预测因素的研究。
Public Health Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;106(4):410-20.
6
Barriers to cervical screening in older women.
Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Jul;21(7):973-8.