• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测试生物相容性的细胞培养方法。

Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility.

作者信息

Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Cenni E, Arciola C R, Granchi D, Savarino L

机构信息

Laboratory for Biocompatibility Research on Implant Materials, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Mater. 1994;15(3):173-90. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90081-7.

DOI:10.1016/0267-6605(94)90081-7
PMID:10172075
Abstract

Cell culture systems may be of value in testing the biocompatibility of prosthetic materials before they are introduced into clinical use. In recent years, in vitro methods for assaying biomaterials have gained in importance owing to the growing concern over the use of animals for biomaterials testing. Significant effort is therefore being focused toward developing predictive and quantitative, but also simple and reliable, methods of testing using cultured cells. At present, a number of methods for measuring both the cytotoxicity and the specific cytocompatibility of different materials are available. The usefulness of these systems is no longer confined to screening new materials; they can be used to study the mechanisms of action of various materials during tissue/material interaction. This paper reviews the published literature on the use of cell culture models in evaluating biocompatibility and reports on the personal experience of the authors, who have been using cell culture systems for many years and for different purposes.

摘要

细胞培养系统在测试假体材料临床应用前的生物相容性方面可能具有重要价值。近年来,由于对使用动物进行生物材料测试的担忧日益增加,体外检测生物材料的方法变得愈发重要。因此,大量工作集中在开发使用培养细胞进行预测性、定量性,同时又简单可靠的测试方法。目前,有多种用于测量不同材料细胞毒性和特定细胞相容性的方法。这些系统的用途不再局限于筛选新材料;它们可用于研究各种材料在组织/材料相互作用过程中的作用机制。本文综述了关于使用细胞培养模型评估生物相容性的已发表文献,并报告了作者的个人经验,作者多年来出于不同目的一直在使用细胞培养系统。

相似文献

1
Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility.用于测试生物相容性的细胞培养方法。
Clin Mater. 1994;15(3):173-90. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90081-7.
2
Current trends in biocompatibility testing.生物相容性测试的当前趋势。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1998;212(2):75-84. doi: 10.1243/0954411981533845.
3
Experimental model for observation of micromotion in cell culture.用于观察细胞培养中微动的实验模型。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Feb 15;72(2):379-87. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30172.
4
The impact of contact angle on the biocompatibility of biomaterials.接触角对生物材料生物相容性的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;87(6):387-99. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181da863e.
5
Importance of material evaluation prior to the construction of devices for in vitro techniques.体外技术设备构建前材料评估的重要性。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013 Nov;65(7-8):973-8. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
6
Biocompatibility testing for medical implant materials: the activities of F04.16 on biocompatibility test methods.医用植入材料的生物相容性测试:F04.16关于生物相容性测试方法的活动
Stand News. 1994 Mar;22(3):46-9.
7
[Biocompatibility testing--a 2-phase model].[生物相容性测试——两阶段模型]
Biomed Tech (Berl). 1986 Sep;31(9):192-5. doi: 10.1515/bmte.1986.31.9.192.
8
Structural integrity assessment of heart valve prostheses: a damage tolerance analysis of the CarboMedics Prosthetic Heart Valve.心脏瓣膜假体的结构完整性评估:CarboMedics人工心脏瓣膜的损伤容限分析。
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Jun;5 Suppl 1:S86-96.
9
Application of a combination of neutral red and amido black staining for rapid, reliable cytotoxicity testing of biomaterials.中性红和酰胺黑染色组合在生物材料快速、可靠细胞毒性测试中的应用
Biomaterials. 1996 Jul;17(13):1259-64.
10
Regulatory biocompatibility requirements for biomaterials used in regenerative medicine.再生医学中使用的生物材料的监管生物相容性要求。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 Feb;26(2):89. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5421-7. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibacterial and biocompatibility properties of bioactive glass and double antibiotic-loaded hydrogels in regenerative endodontic treatment.生物活性玻璃和双重抗生素负载水凝胶在牙髓再生治疗中的抗菌及生物相容性特性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09057-0.
2
Preclinical Assessment of Living Therapeutic Materials: State-of-Art and Challenges.活性治疗材料的临床前评估:现状与挑战
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025 May 12;11(5):2584-2600. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00247. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
3
Biological and Mechanical Performance of Dual-Setting Brushite-Silica Gel Cements.
双凝固型透钙磷石-硅胶骨水泥的生物学和力学性能
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 18;15(4):108. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040108.
4
Aerogel-Based Materials in Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering-A Review with Future Implications.基于气凝胶的材料在骨与软骨组织工程中的应用——综述及未来展望
Gels. 2023 Sep 13;9(9):746. doi: 10.3390/gels9090746.
5
Bone Quantification Around Chitosan-Coated Titanium Dental Implants: A Preliminary Study by Micro-CT Analysis in Jaw of a Canine Model.壳聚糖涂层钛牙种植体周围的骨定量分析:犬颌骨模型的微型CT分析初步研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 7;10:858786. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.858786. eCollection 2022.
6
Manufacturing and Examination of Vaginal Drug Delivery System by FDM 3D Printing.基于熔融沉积成型3D打印技术的阴道给药系统的制造与检测
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Oct 16;13(10):1714. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101714.
7
Use of 3D Printing for the Development of Biodegradable Antiplatelet Materials for Cardiovascular Applications.3D打印在用于心血管应用的可生物降解抗血小板材料研发中的应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Sep 11;14(9):921. doi: 10.3390/ph14090921.
8
In Vitro Tests of FDM 3D-Printed Diclofenac Sodium-Containing Implants.体外测试 FDM 3D 打印含双氯芬酸钠植入物。
Molecules. 2020 Dec 13;25(24):5889. doi: 10.3390/molecules25245889.
9
Research into biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of daptomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin antibiotics at common doses added to bone cement.达托霉素、庆大霉素、万古霉素和替考拉宁抗生素在添加到骨水泥中的常用剂量下的生物相容性和细胞毒性研究。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):328-334. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74943. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Evaluating the Effect of Non-cellular Bioactive Glass-Containing Scaffolds on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis in Animal Bone Defect Models.评估含无细胞生物活性玻璃支架对动物骨缺损模型中骨生成和血管生成的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 May 14;8:430. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00430. eCollection 2020.