• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金钱激励、年龄与认知。

Monetary incentive, age, and cognition.

作者信息

Gribbin K, Schaie K W

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 1976 Sep;2(5):461-8. doi: 10.1080/03610737608258003.

DOI:10.1080/03610737608258003
PMID:1017461
Abstract

Results from studies of cohort differences suggest that older and younger volunteers may differ in aspects other than age. In this study subjects, who had or had not been promised $10.00 payment for their participation, were compared on certain personality and intelligence factors. No differences between incentive conditions were observed for 2466 potential subjects on willingness to participate, nor for 591 subjects eventually tested on their scores on the Primary Mental Abilities Test, the Test of Behavioral Rigidity and Cattell's 16 PF. However, differences by incentive condition were observed on the intercorrelation matrices for women on Form B of the 16 PF. Results of these analyses suggest that, with few exceptions, supplying a monetary incentive to induce subjects to participate in a study does not significantly alter the characteristics of a volunteer sample with regard to age or sex.

摘要

队列差异研究结果表明,老年和年轻志愿者可能在年龄以外的其他方面存在差异。在本研究中,比较了承诺给予10美元参与报酬和未承诺的受试者在某些人格和智力因素方面的情况。对于2466名潜在受试者,在参与意愿方面未观察到激励条件之间的差异;对于最终接受初级心理能力测试、行为僵化测试和卡特尔16种人格因素问卷测试的591名受试者,也未观察到差异。然而,在16种人格因素问卷B表上,女性的相互关系矩阵中观察到了激励条件导致的差异。这些分析结果表明,除少数例外情况,提供金钱激励以促使受试者参与研究,在年龄或性别方面不会显著改变志愿者样本的特征。

相似文献

1
Monetary incentive, age, and cognition.金钱激励、年龄与认知。
Exp Aging Res. 1976 Sep;2(5):461-8. doi: 10.1080/03610737608258003.
2
Age and sex differences on four measures of cognitive ability.认知能力四项指标上的年龄和性别差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Jun;72(3 Pt 2):1172-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.3c.1172.
3
Performance deficits on tests of problem solving in alcoholics: cognitive or motivational impairment?酗酒者解决问题测试中的表现缺陷:认知还是动机受损?
J Subst Abuse. 1989;1(4):381-92.
4
Age differences in cerebral blood flow during rest and during mental activation measurements with and without monetary incentive.在有和没有金钱激励的情况下,静息状态及精神激活测量期间脑血流量的年龄差异。
J Gerontol. 1985 Jan;40(1):53-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/40.1.53.
5
Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects.健康老年受试者对预期和意外货币绩效结果的处理。
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Apr;125(2):241-51. doi: 10.1037/a0022536.
6
Effects of memory demand and motivation on sustained attention in young and older adults.记忆需求和动机对年轻人及老年人持续注意力的影响。
Am J Psychol. 1996 Summer;109(2):187-204.
7
Motivation: cause or confound in information processing/intelligence correlations?动机:信息处理/智力相关性中的原因还是混淆因素?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1994 Feb;85(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90018-3.
8
Disconnecting force from money: effects of basal ganglia damage on incentive motivation.切断金钱与动机的联系:基底神经节损伤对激励动机的影响。
Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1303-10. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn045. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
The effects of incentive on antisaccades: is a dopaminergic mechanism involved?奖励对反扫视的影响:涉及多巴胺能机制吗?
Behav Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;8(5):373-82.

引用本文的文献

1
The Seattle Longitudinal Study of Adult Cognitive Development.西雅图成人认知发展纵向研究
ISSBD Bull. 2010;57(1):24-29.
2
Agency and communion attributes in adults' spontaneous self-representations.成年人自发自我表征中的能动性与共融性特质
Int J Behav Dev. 2004;28:1-15. doi: 10.1080/01650250344000226.
3
Why healthy subjects volunteer for phase I studies and how they perceive their participation?为什么健康受试者会自愿参加I期研究,以及他们如何看待自己的参与?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;63(11):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0368-3. Epub 2007 Sep 20.