• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦对经济评估方法标准的处理方式。

The Danish approach to standards for economic evaluation methodologies.

作者信息

Alban A, Gyldmark M, Pedersen A V, Søgaard J

机构信息

Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Dec;12(6):627-36. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712060-00003.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199712060-00003
PMID:10175975
Abstract

Standards for economic evaluation have now been proposed in several countries. The background for this article is a report commissioned in 1994 by the Danish health authorities (the National Board of Health and the Danish Ministry of Health) on the state of the art of economic evaluation: are the methods ready to be used for systematic decision-making in the Danish healthcare sector? The themes of this article are the attitude towards economic evaluation of medical technologies and healthcare services in Denmark, the areas for application and the desirability and feasibility of a standard set of methods for conducting economic evaluations. In addition, the current state of methodologies in economic evaluation is briefly outlined. On the background of a roundtable discussion of interested parties, the Danish health authorities have decided to introduce economic evaluation of new pharmaceutical products, on a voluntary basis for 2 to 3 years, when application has been made for public reimbursement.

摘要

现在,几个国家已经提出了经济评估标准。本文的背景是丹麦卫生当局(国家卫生局和丹麦卫生部)于1994年委托撰写的一份关于经济评估技术现状的报告:这些方法是否准备好用于丹麦医疗保健部门的系统决策?本文的主题是丹麦对医疗技术和医疗服务经济评估的态度、应用领域以及一套进行经济评估的标准方法的可取性和可行性。此外,还简要概述了经济评估方法的当前状况。在相关各方进行圆桌讨论的背景下,丹麦卫生当局决定在新药品申请公共报销时,在2至3年的自愿基础上引入对新药品的经济评估。

相似文献

1
The Danish approach to standards for economic evaluation methodologies.丹麦对经济评估方法标准的处理方式。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Dec;12(6):627-36. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712060-00003.
2
Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective.药品的经济评估:欧洲视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Sep;4(3):173-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304030-00003.
3
Design, analysis and presentation of multinational economic studies: the need for guidance.跨国经济研究的设计、分析与呈现:指导的必要性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(2):75-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220020-00001.
4
Reimbursement of glitazones in treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in Denmark in the context of a voluntary system for submitting pharmacoeconomic studies.在丹麦自愿提交药物经济学研究的体系下,噻唑烷二酮类药物用于治疗2型糖尿病患者的报销情况。
Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Oct;5(3):263-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0235-4.
5
Economic evaluation of drugs and its potential uses in policy making.药物的经济评估及其在政策制定中的潜在用途。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Sep;8(3):190-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508030-00003.
6
The revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.修订后的《加拿大药品经济评估指南》
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 May;15(5):459-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915050-00004.
7
The emerging government requirement for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals.政府对药品经济评估的新要求。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994;6 Suppl 1:42-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199400061-00012.
8
Is there a need for standardization of methods in economic evaluations of medicine?
Med Care. 1996 Dec;34(12 Suppl):DS13-22.
9
[Pharmacoeconomics--survey and status].[药物经济学——调查与现状]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1670-4.
10
Canadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Canadian Collaborative Workshop for Pharmacoeconomics.加拿大药品经济评估指南。加拿大药物经济学协作研讨会。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Jun;9(6):535-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609060-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: a multi-country analysis.欧洲老年人呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗接种成本效益的影响因素:一项多国分析
BMC Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03970-x.
2
Economic Evaluation of a Personalized Nutrition Plan Based on Omic Sciences Versus a General Nutrition Plan in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A Modeling Study Based on Trial Data in Denmark.基于组学科学的个性化营养计划与一般营养计划对超重和肥胖成年人的经济评估:一项基于丹麦试验数据的建模研究
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):313-331. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00461-8. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Indirect costs in economic studies: confronting the confusion.经济研究中的间接成本:直面混淆
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Dec;4(6):446-54. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304060-00006.
2
Why is the pharmaceutical industry investing increasing amounts in health economic evaluations?为什么制药行业在健康经济评估方面投入的资金越来越多?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Fall;11(4):750-61. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009181.
3
Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.评估健康状况和生活质量的通用及疾病特异性指标。
National Healthcare Economic Evaluation Guidelines: A Cross-Country Comparison.
国家医疗保健经济评估指南:跨国比较
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):349-364. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00250-7. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
4
Early enteral nutrition in critical illness: a full economic analysis using US costs.危重症患者的早期肠内营养:基于美国成本的全面经济分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Aug 23;5:429-36. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S50722. eCollection 2013.
5
Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a full economic analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial based on US costs.短期存在早期肠内营养相对禁忌证的危重症患者的早期肠外营养:基于美国成本的多中心随机对照试验的全面经济分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Jul 22;5:369-79. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S48821. Print 2013.
6
Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?靶向治疗的经济学评价能否为决策者提供支持?
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):36s-45s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000315.
7
Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?靶向治疗的经济学评价能否为决策者提供支持?
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May;17 Suppl 5 Developing(0 5 0):SP61-70.
8
The revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.修订后的《加拿大药品经济评估指南》
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 May;15(5):459-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915050-00004.
9
Pharmacoeconomics in the new millennium. A pharmaceutical industry perspective.新千年的药物经济学。制药行业视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Feb;13(2):175-80. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00002.
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S217-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018.
4
Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease.迈向估算疾病间接成本的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(9):1005-10. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90131-9.