• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤分诊:美国医学专业人士协会的转运指南是否能有效实施?

Trauma triage: do AAMS transport guidelines do it effectively?

作者信息

Bamoski A, Kovach B, Podmore M, Pastis E, Fallon W F

机构信息

MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.

出版信息

Air Med J. 1998 Jan-Mar;17(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(98)90085-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1067-991x(98)90085-2
PMID:10176558
Abstract

PURPOSE

Appropriateness of helicopter transport for trauma patient transfer is under closer scrutiny with the development of regionalized trauma systems and managed care. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the 14 Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) guidelines in triaging trauma patients.

METHODS

The application of the trauma transport guidelines for 511 patients flown to our trauma center with hospital stays of fewer than 3 days were analyzed to ensure high sensitivity to overtriage. Injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and mortality rates associated with each of the guidelines were analyzed.

RESULTS

Each guideline was associated with mortality greater than or equal to 20%, except motor vehicle, falls, amputation, and degloving. All guidelines had significant ISS (> 14), RTS (< 10), and GCS (< 12), except falls (ISS-6.7, RTS-11, GCS-13.3) and amputations (ISS-6.3, RTS-11, GCS-13.5). Degloving, motor vehicle, spinal cord, airway, and extrication also had a significantly higher RTS (> 12).

CONCLUSION

The AAMS transport guidelines for trauma patients accurately predict the potential for serious or life-threatening injury, with the exception of falls and amputations. The rapid access to highly skilled reimplantation teams required by patients with amputations justifies helicopter transport. However, falls greater than 20 feet do not appear to identify potential for life-threatening injury.

摘要

目的

随着区域化创伤系统和管理式医疗的发展,直升机转运创伤患者的适宜性受到了更密切的审视。本研究旨在确定空中医疗服务协会(AAMS)的14项指南在创伤患者分诊中的有效性。

方法

分析了511名被送往我们创伤中心且住院时间少于3天的患者的创伤转运指南应用情况,以确保对过度分诊具有高敏感性。分析了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、修订创伤评分(RTS)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)以及与每项指南相关的死亡率。

结果

除机动车伤、坠落伤、截肢伤和脱套伤外,每项指南的死亡率均大于或等于20%。除坠落伤(ISS - 6.7,RTS - 11,GCS - 13.3)和截肢伤(ISS - 6.3,RTS - 11,GCS - 13.5)外,所有指南的ISS均大于14、RTS均小于10且GCS均小于12。脱套伤、机动车伤、脊髓损伤、气道损伤和解救伤的RTS也显著更高(大于12)。

结论

AAMS创伤患者转运指南能准确预测严重或危及生命损伤的可能性,但坠落伤和截肢伤除外。截肢患者需要快速获得高技能再植团队,这证明了直升机转运的合理性。然而,超过20英尺的坠落伤似乎无法识别危及生命损伤的可能性。

相似文献

1
Trauma triage: do AAMS transport guidelines do it effectively?创伤分诊:美国医学专业人士协会的转运指南是否能有效实施?
Air Med J. 1998 Jan-Mar;17(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(98)90085-2.
2
Helicopter overtriage in pediatric trauma.儿科创伤中的直升机过度分诊
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
3
Are there Field Triage Criteria that Can Predict Low-Yield Air Medical Transports?是否存在可预测低产空运医疗转运的现场分诊标准?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Dec;34(6):596-603. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004904. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
Helicopter transport of injured children: system effectiveness and triage criteria.受伤儿童的直升机转运:系统有效性及分诊标准。
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Aug;31(8):1183-6; discussion 1187-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90114-1.
5
A comparison of pediatric and adult trauma patients transported by helicopter and ground EMS: managed-care considerations.直升机和地面紧急医疗服务转运的儿科与成人创伤患者的比较:管理式医疗考量
Air Med J. 1996 Jan-Mar;15(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(96)90015-2.
6
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Prehospital physiologic data and lifesaving interventions in trauma patients.创伤患者的院前生理数据及救生干预措施。
Mil Med. 2005 Jan;170(1):7-13. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.1.7.
8
Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.
9
Does scene physiology predict helicopter transport trauma admission?现场生理学能否预测直升机转运创伤入院?
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 25.
10
An Evidence-based Guideline for the air medical transportation of prehospital trauma patients.创伤患者院前航空医疗转运的循证指南
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18 Suppl 1:35-44. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844872. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.