• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过跨学科合作提升医疗服务:一项案例研究。

Enhancing care delivery through cross-disciplinary collaboration: a case study.

作者信息

Liedtka J M, Whitten E

机构信息

University of Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Manag. 1998 Mar-Apr;43(2):185-203; discussion 203-5.

PMID:10179019
Abstract

This exploratory research investigates the factors contributing to and detracting from collaboration across professional groups that are working within an academic medical center. Examined within the context of three recently created service lines, the study uses both objective performance data and perceptual data obtained from the physicians, nurses, and administrators. A similar set of factors emerged across all three service lines and professional groups. These factors were highly correlated with the perceived success of the collaborative efforts in producing positive outcomes in both quality and efficiency of care, patient satisfaction, and improved work environment. Findings of the study highlight the importance of shared values, trust, and personal engagement--all empirically demonstrated to be linked with the participants' perceptions of successful collaboration. The study, however, failed to find improvement in the objective performance data analyzed. In addition, individual professional groups were found to have differing views of the collaborative environment, raising important issues for the management of collaborative efforts in the hospital setting.

摘要

这项探索性研究调查了在学术医疗中心工作的不同专业群体间协作的促进因素和阻碍因素。该研究以最近设立的三条服务线为背景,使用了从医生、护士和管理人员那里获得的客观绩效数据和感知数据。在所有三条服务线和专业群体中都出现了一组相似的因素。这些因素与协作努力在护理质量和效率、患者满意度以及工作环境改善方面产生积极成果的感知成功高度相关。研究结果强调了共享价值观、信任和个人参与的重要性——所有这些都通过实证证明与参与者对成功协作的看法相关。然而,该研究在所分析的客观绩效数据中未发现改善。此外,发现各个专业群体对协作环境有不同的看法,这为医院环境中协作努力的管理提出了重要问题。

相似文献

1
Enhancing care delivery through cross-disciplinary collaboration: a case study.通过跨学科合作提升医疗服务:一项案例研究。
J Healthc Manag. 1998 Mar-Apr;43(2):185-203; discussion 203-5.
2
Product line development: a strategy for clinical success in academic centers.产品线开发:学术中心临床成功的一项策略。
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):585-90; discussion 590-2. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a97d.
3
Nurses' satisfaction with their work environment and the outcomes of clinical nursing supervision on nurses' experiences of well-being -- a Norwegian study.护士对其工作环境的满意度以及临床护理监督对护士幸福感体验的影响——一项挪威的研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2005 May;13(3):221-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00527.x.
4
Case study update. Arizona's UMC model of patient-center care thrives after four years. Three new features of redesign at University Medical Center, Tucson.
Strateg Healthc Excell. 1995 Apr;8(4):1-8.
5
Improving performance through change: an academic medical center's experience.通过变革提升绩效:一所学术医疗中心的经验
Nurs Adm Q. 1999 Winter;23(2):74-82.
6
The impact of an ICU liaison nurse: a case study of ward nurses' perceptions.重症监护室联络护士的影响:一项关于病房护士认知的案例研究
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):766-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01141.x.
7
Collaboration through clinical integration.通过临床整合实现协作。
Nurs Adm Q. 2008 Apr-Jun;32(2):109-16. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000314539.44488.e6.
8
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
9
Key indicators of nursing care team performance: insights from the front line.护理团队绩效的关键指标:来自一线的见解。
Health Care Superv. 1999 Jun;17(4):70-6.
10
A unit model for collaborative practice: creating the ideal patient experience and practice environment.协作实践的单元模型:创造理想的患者体验和实践环境。
Pa Nurse. 2007 Jun;62(2):9, 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual perspectives and mental maps of working conditions and intention to stay of physicians in academic medicine.学术医学领域医生对工作条件的个人观点、心理认知及留任意向。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1106501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106501. eCollection 2023.
2
Economic Impact of Pharmacist-Participated Medication Management for Elderly Patients in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.养老院中药师参与的药物管理对老年患者的经济影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2955. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162955.
3
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of learning communication in the healthcare workplace: an Australian interview study.
医护专业人员对在医疗工作场所中学习沟通的看法:澳大利亚访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025445.
4
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study.医生的形象和认知是跨学科合作的障碍吗?——以德国职业健康医生在康复过程中的情况为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3564-1.
5
Delivering Integrated Care to the Frail Elderly: The Impact on Professionals' Objective Burden and Job Satisfaction.为体弱老年人提供综合护理:对专业人员客观负担和工作满意度的影响。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 17;16(3):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2014.
6
Situational awareness, relational coordination and integrated care delivery to hospitalized elderly in the Netherlands: a comparison between hospitals.荷兰住院老年人的情境意识、关系协调与综合护理服务:医院间的比较
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Jan 10;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-3.
7
A framework for understanding outcomes of integrated care programs for the hospitalised elderly.理解老年住院患者综合护理计划结果的框架。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Nov 28;13:e047. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1063. eCollection 2013.
8
Professionals' views on interprofessional stroke team functioning.专业人员对跨专业脑卒中团队运作的看法。
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jul;11:e081. doi: 10.5334/ijic.657. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care.评估癌症治疗中的跨学科影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 3;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-144.
10
Interdisciplinary research training in a school of nursing.护理学院的跨学科研究培训。
Nurs Outlook. 2011 Jan-Feb;59(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.11.002.