• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合医疗与社会服务的五项法则:来自美国和英国的经验教训

Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Leutz W N

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy, Heller Graduate School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1999;77(1):77-110, iv-v. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00125.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00125
PMID:10197028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751110/
Abstract

Because persons with disabilities (PWDs) use health and social services extensively, both the United States and the United Kingdom have begun to integrate care across systems. Initiatives in these two countries are examined within the context of the reality that personal needs and use of systems differ by age and by type and severity of disability. The lessons derived from this scrutiny are presented in the form of five "laws" of integration. These laws identify three levels of integration, point to alternative roles for physicians, outline resource requirements, highlight friction from differing medical and social paradigms, and urge policy makers and administrators to consider carefully who would be most appropriately selected to design, oversee, and administer integration initiatives. Both users and caregivers must be involved in planning to ensure that all three levels of integration are attended to and that the borders between medical and other systems are clarified.

摘要

由于残疾人广泛使用健康和社会服务,美国和英国都已开始整合跨系统护理。鉴于个人需求以及系统使用情况因年龄、残疾类型和严重程度而异这一现实背景,对这两个国家的举措进行了审视。从这种审视中得出的经验教训以整合的五条“法则”形式呈现。这些法则确定了三个整合层次,指出了医生的不同角色,概述了资源需求,突出了不同医学和社会范式之间的摩擦,并敦促政策制定者和管理人员仔细考虑谁最适合被选来设计、监督和管理整合举措。用户和护理人员都必须参与规划,以确保三个整合层次都得到关注,并且明确医疗系统和其他系统之间的界限。

相似文献

1
Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom.整合医疗与社会服务的五项法则:来自美国和英国的经验教训
Milbank Q. 1999;77(1):77-110, iv-v. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00125.
2
Reflections on the Five Laws of Integrating Medical and Social Services-21 Years Later.《医学与社会服务整合五定律之反思——二十一年后》
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):91-98. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12495. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Integrating healthcare for older populations.整合老年人群的医疗保健服务。
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Jan;5(1):45-52.
4
Learning from Kaiser (part 2). Is integration the answer?向凯撒学习(第二部分)。整合是答案吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Aug;54(505):571-3.
5
Strategies for integrating Medicare and Medicaid: design features and incentives.整合医疗保险和医疗补助的策略:设计特点与激励措施。
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Jun;60(2):123-57. doi: 10.1177/1077558703060002001.
6
Adding long-term care to Medicare: The Social HMO Experience.将长期护理纳入医疗保险:社会健康维护组织的经验。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1991;3(4):69-87. doi: 10.1300/j031v03n04_06.
7
The social health maintenance organization.社会健康维护组织
J Long Term Home Health Care. 1996 Spring;15(2):41-5.
8
Social HMOs: ten years and counting.社会健康维护组织:十年仍在继续。
HMO. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):72-7.
9
Managed care for the elderly in the United States: outcomes to-date and potential for future growth.美国老年人的管理式医疗:迄今的成果及未来增长潜力。
Health Policy. 1997 Sep;41 Suppl:S145-62. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00044-4.
10
Medicare advantage SNPs: a new opportunity for integrated care?医疗保险优势特殊需求计划:综合护理的新机遇?
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2005 Nov 11(808):1-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence inter-organisational integration: a qualitative exploration of service providers' perspectives from an integrated care initiative.影响组织间整合的因素:对来自一项综合护理倡议的服务提供者观点的定性探索
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13051-7.
2
How to Implement: The Need to Address a Fundamental Weakness in the Science of Integrated Care.如何实施:解决综合护理科学中一个基本弱点的必要性。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Jun 27;25(2):21. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9852. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Health and Social Care Integration: Insights from International Implementation Cases.健康与社会护理整合:来自国际实施案例的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 5;13(2):28. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020028. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The development of information infrastructure and technological capabilities used to manage social care and address quality in primary care settings.用于管理社会护理和解决初级保健机构质量问题的信息基础设施和技术能力的发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 9;25(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12821-7.
5
Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis.综合姑息治疗与肿瘤学:一项实在论综合分析
BMC Med. 2025 May 9;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1.
6
Integrating COVID-19 vaccination into routine healthcare: a feasible model for epidemic response at mildmay hospital Uganda.将新冠疫苗接种纳入常规医疗保健:乌干达米尔德梅医院的一种可行的疫情应对模式。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):1406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22733-0.
7
Disease management teams in oncology: State of the art and the experience of a scientific institute of hospitalization and treatment (IRCCS) in Rome, Italy.肿瘤疾病管理团队:意大利罗马一家住院治疗科学研究所(IRCCS)的最新情况与经验
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2024 Dec 5;43:100919. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100919. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Integrating public health and primary care: a framework for seamless collaboration.整合公共卫生与初级保健:无缝协作框架
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0096. Print 2024 Dec.
9
Networks for healthcare delivery: a systematic literature review.医疗保健提供网络:系统文献综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Nov 6;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):36-53. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2023-0262.
10
Care professionals' experiences within a multidisciplinary and cross-sectorial intervention for childbearing women and families in vulnerable positions: a focus group study.照护专业人员在多学科和跨部门干预中的经验:以弱势处境的孕产妇和家庭为对象的焦点小组研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2410503. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2410503. Epub 2024 Oct 14.