Edwards I R
Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Med Trop (Mars). 1998;58(3 Suppl):93-6.
When a drug is newly marketed, there is limited safety information. Less than five thousand humans may have been exposed to the drug, making in impossible to be sure of detecting serious adverse reactions occurring less frequently than 1/1000. Post-marketing safety relies on spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions. Such reporting is usually incomplete and little use is made of drug use and clinical data in analysing for benefit versus risk. Observational epidemiological studies can be used to investigate drug risk hypotheses once these are made, but they are expensive and take time, during which people may be harmed if the hypothesis is correct. Launching drugs in developing countries, which may have little or no safety monitoring infrastructure, puts the onus on the sponsors to monitor the first thousands of patients exposed for adverse reactions. This can be done by maintaining patient records and using simple techniques to promote and facilitate reporting of unusual clinical events to a responsible body of experts. This work must be done in collaboration with national governments. This will help in the general promotion of benefit-risk thinking by those involved in all aspects of drug treatment.
当一种药物刚上市时,安全信息有限。接触过该药物的人类可能不到五千人,因此无法确定能否检测出发生率低于千分之一的严重不良反应。上市后安全性依赖于不良反应的自发报告。此类报告通常不完整,在分析收益与风险时很少利用药物使用和临床数据。一旦提出药物风险假设,可通过观察性流行病学研究来调查,但这类研究成本高昂且耗时,如果假设正确,在此期间人们可能会受到伤害。在可能几乎没有或完全没有安全监测基础设施的发展中国家推出药物,这就要求申办者负责监测最初数千名使用该药物患者的不良反应情况。这可以通过保存患者记录并使用简单方法来促进向负责的专家机构报告异常临床事件来实现。这项工作必须与各国政府合作开展。这将有助于参与药物治疗各个环节的人员普遍树立收益-风险思维。