Suppr超能文献

依普罗沙坦与依那普利对高血压患者肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统及安全性参数的影响:一项为期26周的双盲多中心研究结果。依普罗沙坦多国研究小组

Effects of eprosartan versus enalapril in hypertensive patients on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and safety parameters: results from a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Eprosartan Multinational Study Group.

作者信息

Gavras I, Gavras H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1999;15(1):15-24. doi: 10.1185/03007999909115169.

Abstract

A double-blind comparator study was performed in 528 hypertensive patients [baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure (SitDBP) 95-114 mmHg]. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of drug-related cough in patients treated with enalapril and eprosartan. The secondary objective was to compare antihypertensive efficacy between treatments. This paper reports the effects seen on the safety profile, plasma renin activity, aldosterone and angiotensin II (A-II) in each treatment group. Eprosartan was titrated from 200 mg b.i.d. to 300 mg b.i.d. and enalapril from 5 mg o.d. to 20 mg o.d. over 12 weeks. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg o.d. could be added where required to the treatment for the final six weeks of the titration phase if SitDBP > or = 90 mmHg. Patients received the maximum titrated dosage during the maintenance phase. In the study overall, similar mean changes in blood pressure from baseline were evident with each treatment. Measurement of mean plasma neurohormone levels showed significant increases in renin activity in both groups and statistically significant A-II elevations in the eprosartan group (p < 0.05). Neither eprosartan nor enalapril significantly altered serum lipid profiles or electrolyte levels. Most adverse experiences reported throughout the study were mild or moderate in both treatment groups. Fewer patients receiving eprosartan (4.9%) than enalapril (9.1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse experiences. In conclusion, the results of this study show that eprosartan is well tolerated. Both eprosartan and enalapril significantly increased plasma renin activity while plasma A-II was elevated in the eprosartan group.

摘要

对528例高血压患者[基线坐位舒张压(SitDBP)为95 - 114 mmHg]进行了一项双盲对照研究。主要目的是比较接受依那普利和依普罗沙坦治疗的患者中药物相关性咳嗽的发生率。次要目的是比较各治疗组之间的降压疗效。本文报告了每个治疗组在安全性、血浆肾素活性、醛固酮和血管紧张素II(A-II)方面的观察结果。依普罗沙坦在12周内从每日2次、每次200 mg滴定至每日2次、每次300 mg,依那普利从每日1次、每次5 mg滴定至每日1次、每次20 mg。如果SitDBP≥90 mmHg,在滴定阶段的最后六周可根据需要添加每日1次、每次12.5 - 25 mg的氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)进行治疗。患者在维持阶段接受最大滴定剂量。在整个研究中,每种治疗方法导致的血压相对于基线的平均变化相似。平均血浆神经激素水平测量显示,两组的肾素活性均显著升高,依普罗沙坦组的A-II升高具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。依普罗沙坦和依那普利均未显著改变血脂谱或电解质水平。在整个研究中报告的大多数不良事件在两个治疗组中均为轻度或中度。因不良事件而停药的接受依普罗沙坦治疗的患者(4.9%)少于接受依那普利治疗的患者(9.1%)。总之,本研究结果表明依普罗沙坦耐受性良好。依普罗沙坦和依那普利均显著增加血浆肾素活性,而依普罗沙坦组的血浆A-II升高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验