• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项非语言错误信念任务:儿童与大猩猩的表现。

A nonverbal false belief task: the performance of children and great apes.

作者信息

Call J, Tomasello M

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, U.K.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1999 Mar-Apr;70(2):381-95. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00028.

DOI:10.1111/1467-8624.00028
PMID:10218261
Abstract

A nonverbal task of false belief understanding was given to 4- and 5-year-old children (N = 28) and to two species of great ape: chimpanzees and orangutans (N = 7). The task was embedded in a series of finding games in which an adult (the hider) hid a reward in one of two identical containers, and another adult (the communicator) observed the hiding process and attempted to help the participant by placing a marker on the container that she believed to hold the reward. An initial series of control trials ensured that participants were able to use the marker to locate the reward, follow the reward in both visible and invisible displacements, and ignore the marker when they knew it to be incorrect. In the crucial false belief trials, the communicator watched the hiding process and then left the area, at which time the hider switched the locations of the containers. When the communicator returned, she marked the container at the location where she had seen the reward hidden, which was incorrect. The hider then gave the subject the opportunity to find the sticker. Successful performance required participants to reason as follows: the communicator placed the marker where she saw the reward hidden; the container that was at that location is now at the other location; so the reward is at the other location. Children were also given a verbal false belief task in the context of this same hiding game. The two main results of the study were: (1) children's performance on the verbal and nonverbal false belief tasks were highly correlated (and both fit very closely with age norms from previous studies), and (2) no ape succeeded in the nonverbal false belief task even though they succeeded in all of the control trials indicating mastery of the general task demands.

摘要

一项关于错误信念理解的非语言任务被给予了4岁和5岁的儿童(N = 28)以及两种大型猿类:黑猩猩和猩猩(N = 7)。该任务被嵌入一系列寻找游戏中,在游戏里一名成年人(隐藏者)将奖励藏在两个相同容器中的一个里,另一名成年人(传达者)观察隐藏过程,并试图通过在她认为藏有奖励的容器上放置一个标记来帮助参与者。最初的一系列对照试验确保参与者能够使用标记找到奖励,在奖励可见和不可见移动的情况下追踪奖励,并在知道标记不正确时忽略它。在关键的错误信念试验中,传达者观看隐藏过程,然后离开该区域,此时隐藏者切换了容器的位置。当传达者回来时,她在她看到奖励被隐藏的位置标记了容器,而这个位置是不正确的。然后隐藏者给受试者找到贴纸的机会。成功完成任务要求参与者进行如下推理:传达者在她看到奖励被隐藏的地方放置了标记;当时位于那个位置的容器现在在另一个位置;所以奖励在另一个位置。孩子们在这个相同的隐藏游戏情境中也被给予了一个语言错误信念任务。该研究的两个主要结果是:(1)儿童在语言和非语言错误信念任务上的表现高度相关(并且都与先前研究中的年龄规范非常吻合),以及(2)没有一只猿在非语言错误信念任务中成功,尽管它们在所有对照试验中都成功了,表明它们掌握了一般任务要求。

相似文献

1
A nonverbal false belief task: the performance of children and great apes.一项非语言错误信念任务:儿童与大猩猩的表现。
Child Dev. 1999 Mar-Apr;70(2):381-95. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00028.
2
Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children.猿类和人类儿童对新型交际信号的理解。
Child Dev. 1997 Dec;68(6):1067-80.
3
A competitive nonverbal false belief task for children and apes.一项针对儿童和猿类的竞争性非语言错误信念任务。
Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):521-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00793.x.
4
Tracking and inferring spatial rotation by children and great apes.儿童和大猩猩对空间旋转的追踪与推断
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1396-408. doi: 10.1037/a0012594.
5
Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens).红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)和儿童(智人)的客体永久性。
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):159-71. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.159.
6
The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)、黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和红毛猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)在两种版本的物体选择任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):304-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016222.
7
Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.猿类在物体选择任务中对标志性线索的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0013-4. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
8
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
9
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
10
Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)、一只猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)和人类婴儿(Homo sapiens)在物体选择任务中对实验者给出线索的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):119-26. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.119.

引用本文的文献

1
Domain-specific inferences about conspecifics' skills by chimpanzees.黑猩猩对同种个体技能的领域特异性推断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 23;14(1):21996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73340-9.
2
Understanding others' preferences: A comparison across primate species and human societies.理解他人的偏好:灵长类物种和人类社会的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0295221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295221. eCollection 2024.
3
Investigating belief understanding in children in a nonverbal ambiguous displacement and communication setting.在非言语模糊置换和交流情境中研究儿童的信念理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Apr;240:105830. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105830. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
4
Empirical challenges from the comparative and developmental literature to the Shared Intentionality Theory - a review of alternative data on recursive mind reading, prosociality, imitation and cumulative culture.比较与发展文献对共享意向性理论提出的实证挑战——关于递归心理解读、亲社会性、模仿和累积文化的替代数据综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1157137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157137. eCollection 2023.
5
Canine perspective-taking.犬类换位思考能力。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):275-298. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01736-z. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
Do young children track other's beliefs, or merely their perceptual access? An interactive, anticipatory measure of early theory of mind.幼儿是追踪他人的信念,还是仅仅追踪他人的感知通达?一种早期心理理论的交互式预期测量方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):211278. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211278. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Theory of mind tested by implicit false belief: a simple and full-fledged mental state attribution.内隐错误信念任务检验心理理论:一种简单而成熟的心理状态归因。
FEBS J. 2022 Dec;289(23):7343-7358. doi: 10.1111/febs.16322. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
8
Dogs follow human misleading suggestions more often when the informant has a false belief.当信息提供者有错误的信念时,狗更经常跟随人类的误导性建议。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 28;288(1955):20210906. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0906. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
9
Are the classic false belief tasks cursed? Young children are just as likely as older children to pass a false belief task when they are not required to overcome the curse of knowledge.经典错误信念任务是否受到诅咒?当不需要克服知识诅咒时,年幼的儿童和年长的儿童一样有可能通过错误信念任务。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0244141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244141. eCollection 2021.
10
The pragmatic role of trust in young children's interpretation of unfamiliar signals.信任在幼儿对陌生信号解释中的实用角色。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 30;14(10):e0224648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224648. eCollection 2019.