• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成性问题解决任务中的概念启动

Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task.

作者信息

Marsh R L, Bink M L, Hicks J L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):355-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03211419.

DOI:10.3758/bf03211419
PMID:10226445
Abstract

Three experiments explored how participants solved a very open-ended generative problem-solving task. Previous research has shown that when participants are shown examples, novel creations will tend to conform to features shared across those examples (Smith, Ward, & Schumacher, 1993). We made the shared features of the examples conceptually related to one another. We found that when the features were related to the concept of hostility, participants' creations contained hostile features that were not part of any of the examples. These results suggest that participants will design novel entities to be consistent with emergent properties of examples shown to them. We also found that a mild hostility prime from unscrambling sentences had a similar conceptual effect. Together, the two effects suggest that conceptual priming of generative cognitive tasks will influence the cognitive aspects of the creative process.

摘要

三项实验探究了参与者如何解决一个非常开放式的生成性问题解决任务。先前的研究表明,当向参与者展示示例时,新颖的创作往往会符合这些示例中共享的特征(史密斯、沃德和舒马赫,1993年)。我们使示例的共享特征在概念上相互关联。我们发现,当这些特征与敌意概念相关时,参与者的创作包含了不属于任何示例的敌意特征。这些结果表明,参与者会设计新颖的实体,使其与向他们展示的示例的涌现属性相一致。我们还发现,通过整理句子进行的轻度敌意启动具有类似的概念效果。这两种效果共同表明,生成性认知任务的概念启动将影响创作过程的认知方面。

相似文献

1
Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task.生成性问题解决任务中的概念启动
Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):355-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03211419.
2
Priming problem solving with conceptual processing of relevant objects.通过对相关对象进行概念处理来启动问题解决。
J Gen Psychol. 2004 Apr;131(2):118-35. doi: 10.3200/genp.131.2.118-135.
3
How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.示例如何(以及如何不)限制创造力。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Sep;24(5):669-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03201091.
4
Decomposing intuitive components in a conceptual problem solving task.在概念性问题解决任务中分解直观组件。
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Jun;16(2):294-309. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
5
Can false memories prime problem solutions?虚假记忆能启发问题的解决方案吗?
Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
6
Assessment of planning abilities in individuals with mild cognitive impairment using an open-ended problem-solving task.使用开放式问题解决任务评估轻度认知障碍个体的规划能力。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(10):1084-97. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.983462.
7
The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task.在生成性认知任务中对先验知识的无意使用。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):94-105. doi: 10.3758/bf03201216.
8
Worked examples and tutored problem solving: redundant or synergistic forms of support?实例分析与辅导式问题解决:支持的冗余形式还是协同形式?
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):203-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01011.x.
9
Manipulations that disrupt generative processes decrease conformity to examples: evidence from two paradigms.破坏生成过程的操作会降低对范例的遵从性:来自两种范式的证据。
Memory. 2004 Jan;12(1):90-103. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000388.
10
Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1134-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design.类比距离与类比功能及发明前结构的关系:以工程设计为例。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):29-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03195939.

本文引用的文献

1
Hostility in neurotics and normals.神经症患者与正常人的敌意。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1955 Jan;50(1):36-40. doi: 10.1037/h0041326.
2
How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.示例如何(以及如何不)限制创造力。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Sep;24(5):669-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03201091.
3
Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory.激活内隐记忆的再激活理论。
Conscious Cogn. 1996 Mar-Jun;5(1-2):27-72. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0004.
4
Eliciting cryptomnesia: unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task.引发潜隐记忆:谜题任务中的无意识剽窃
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):673-88. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.673.
5
Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task.创造性生成任务中示例的约束作用。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Nov;21(6):837-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03202751.
6
Human cognition in its social context.社会背景下的人类认知。
Psychol Rev. 1986 Jul;93(3):322-59.
7
Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.作为范畴中等级结构决定因素的理想、集中趋势和实例化频率。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Oct;11(4):629-54. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.1-4.629.