Krismer M, Chen A M, Steinlechner M, Haid C, Lener M, Wimmer C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
J Spinal Disord. 1999 Apr;12(2):126-30.
This study compared Ho's and Aaro's method to measure vertebral axial rotation in order to find the more accurate one. Two hundred fifty-nine CT scans were taken from 11 cadaver vertebrae. The scans were performed with vertebrae in neutral position and angulated up to 20 degrees in the sagittal and frontal plane to simulate kyphosis/lordosis and side bending. Axial rotation was measured according to both methods. The mean difference between true and measured values was 3.7 +/- 6.7 (95% confidence limit) (Ho's method) and 2.3 +/- 3.7 (Aaro's method), respectively. Correlation with true axial rotation was r2 = 0.66 (Ho's method) and r2 = 0.77 (Aaro's method). We recommend using Aaro's method as the more accurate measure of axial rotation in scoliotic vertebrae.
本研究比较了何氏和阿罗氏测量椎体轴向旋转的方法,以找出更准确的方法。从11具尸体的椎骨上获取了259份CT扫描图像。扫描时椎骨处于中立位,并在矢状面和额状面成角达20度,以模拟脊柱后凸/前凸和侧弯。根据两种方法测量轴向旋转。真实值与测量值之间的平均差异分别为3.7±6.7(95%置信限)(何氏方法)和2.3±3.7(阿罗氏方法)。与真实轴向旋转的相关性分别为r2 = 0.66(何氏方法)和r2 = 0.77(阿罗氏方法)。我们建议使用阿罗氏方法作为测量脊柱侧弯椎体轴向旋转更准确的方法。