Spence M T, Redmond A D, Edwards J D
Health Trends. 1988 Aug;20(3):94-7.
The TRISS methodology for evaluating trauma care has been applied in two UK hospitals over a 12 month period. Unexpected deaths occurred in both hospitals and were related to delays in transport between hospitals. The delays were instigated by the receiving hospitals and never the despatching hospital. Unexpected survival occurred in one of the hospitals. The common factors were: 1. Patients were taken there directly and did not require further transfer. 2. They were resuscitated by a consultant. 3. They were electively ventilated. 4. CT Scan excluded a neurosurgical emergency. 5. When surgery was required it was carried out early. 6. They were treated for several weeks in an ICU with 24 hour direct consultant involvement. They all developed septic shock and acute respiratory distress but ultimately made a full recovery. This evidence supports the view that direct transfer of patients to Trauma Centres in the UK is likely to reduce unnecessary deaths. The development of such a system and the location of such centres must be based on objective measures of case mix and performance. We recommend the establishment and development of a Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) (UK).
用于评估创伤护理的TRISS方法在英国两家医院进行了为期12个月的应用。两家医院均出现了意外死亡情况,且与医院间转运延迟有关。这些延迟是由接收医院引发的,而非发送医院。其中一家医院出现了意外存活的情况。共同因素包括:1. 患者直接被送往该院,无需进一步转运。2. 由一名顾问进行复苏。3. 进行选择性通气。4. CT扫描排除了神经外科急症。5. 需要手术时尽早进行。6. 在重症监护病房接受了数周治疗,顾问24小时直接参与。他们均出现了感染性休克和急性呼吸窘迫,但最终完全康复。这一证据支持了这样一种观点,即英国将患者直接转运至创伤中心可能会减少不必要的死亡。这样一个系统的建立以及此类中心的选址必须基于病例组合和绩效的客观指标。我们建议在英国建立并开展一项重大创伤结局研究(MTOS)。