• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从疟疾消除前期到消除阶段疟疾干预措施的成本效益:伊朗的一项研究

Cost Effectiveness of Malaria Interventions from Preelimination through Elimination: a Study in Iran.

作者信息

Rezaei-Hemami Mohsen, Akbari-Sari Ali, Raiesi Ahmad, Vatandoost Hassan, Majdzadeh Reza

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2013 Dec 18;8(1):43-52. eCollection 2014.

PMID:25629064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4289510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malaria still is considered as a public health problem in Iran. The aim of the National Malaria Control Department is to reach the elimination by 2024. By decreasing the number of malaria cases in preelimination phase the cost effectiveness of malaria interventions decreases considerably. This study estimated the cost effectiveness of various strategies to combat malaria in preelimination and elimination phases in Iran.

METHODS

running costs of the interventions at each level of intervention was estimated by using evidence and expert opinions. The effect of each intervention was estimated using the documentary evidence available and expert opinions. Using a point estimate and distribution of each variable the sensitivity was evaluated with the Monte Carlo method.

RESULTS

The most cost-effective interventions were insecticide treated net (ITN), larviciding, surveillance for diagnosis and treatment of patients less than 24 hours, and indoor residual spraying (IRS) respectively, No related evidence found for the effectiveness of the border facilities.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that interventions in the elimination phase of malaria have low cost effectiveness in Iran like many other countries. However ITN is the most cost effective intervention among the available interventions.

摘要

背景

疟疾在伊朗仍被视为一个公共卫生问题。国家疟疾控制部门的目标是到2024年实现疟疾消除。在消除前阶段,随着疟疾病例数量的减少,疟疾干预措施的成本效益大幅下降。本研究估计了伊朗在疟疾消除前和消除阶段对抗疟疾的各种策略的成本效益。

方法

通过使用证据和专家意见估计每个干预水平的干预措施运行成本。利用现有文献证据和专家意见估计每种干预措施的效果。使用每个变量的点估计和分布,采用蒙特卡罗方法评估敏感性。

结果

最具成本效益的干预措施分别是经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)、杀幼虫、对24小时内患者的诊断和治疗监测以及室内滞留喷洒(IRS),未发现有关边境设施有效性的相关证据。

结论

本研究表明,与许多其他国家一样,伊朗疟疾消除阶段的干预措施成本效益较低。然而,在现有干预措施中,经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐是最具成本效益的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ee/4289510/1e246bc6cb7c/jad-8-43f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ee/4289510/c64eb013d4f6/jad-8-43f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ee/4289510/1e246bc6cb7c/jad-8-43f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ee/4289510/c64eb013d4f6/jad-8-43f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ee/4289510/1e246bc6cb7c/jad-8-43f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Malaria Interventions from Preelimination through Elimination: a Study in Iran.从疟疾消除前期到消除阶段疟疾干预措施的成本效益:伊朗的一项研究
J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2013 Dec 18;8(1):43-52. eCollection 2014.
2
Household knowledge and practices concerning malaria and indoor residual spraying in an endemic area earmarked for malaria elimination in Iran.伊朗一个被指定为消除疟疾地区的有关疟疾和室内残留喷洒的家庭知识和做法。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Dec 6;10(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2548-z.
3
Routine implementation costs of larviciding with Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis against malaria vectors in a district in rural Burkina Faso.在布基纳法索农村某地区使用苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列亚种进行杀幼虫剂防治疟疾媒介的常规实施成本。
Malar J. 2016 Jul 22;15(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1438-8.
4
Measures of Malaria Burden after Long-Lasting Insecticidal Net Distribution and Indoor Residual Spraying at Three Sites in Uganda: A Prospective Observational Study.乌干达三个地点长效驱虫蚊帐分发和室内滞留喷洒后疟疾负担的测量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 8;13(11):e1002167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002167. eCollection 2016 Nov.
5
Cost of malaria control in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡疟疾防治的成本。
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(4):301-9.
6
Cost-effectiveness of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区疟疾防控的成本效益
Lancet. 1999 Jul 31;354(9176):378-85. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02141-8.
7
Analysis of clinical malaria disease patterns and trends in Vietnam 2009-2015.2009-2015 年越南临床疟疾疾病模式和趋势分析。
Malar J. 2018 Sep 17;17(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2478-z.
8
Scaling up malaria intervention "packages" in Senegal: using cost effectiveness data for improving allocative efficiency and programmatic decision-making.在塞内加尔扩大疟疾干预“套餐”:利用成本效益数据提高配置效率和决策制定。
Malar J. 2018 Apr 10;17(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2305-6.
9
An observational analysis of the impact of indoor residual spraying with non-pyrethroid insecticides on the incidence of malaria in Ségou Region, Mali: 2012-2015.塞古地区 2012-2015 年非拟除虫菊酯类室内滞留喷洒对疟疾发病率影响的观察性分析
Malar J. 2018 Jan 10;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2168-2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions when malaria mortality is low: insecticide-treated nets versus in-house residual spraying in India.疟疾死亡率较低时疟疾控制干预措施的成本效益:印度的长效驱虫蚊帐与室内滞留喷洒比较
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(3):525-39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost of the national malaria control program and cost-effectiveness of indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated bed net interventions in two districts of Madagascar.马达加斯加两个地区国家疟疾控制项目的成本以及室内滞留喷洒和经杀虫剂处理蚊帐干预措施的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Dec 3;22(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00598-1.
2
Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions.健康经济学研究是否与中东和北非地区的疾病负担一致?公共卫生干预措施的经济评估研究的系统评价。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jul 25;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Operational strategies to achieve and maintain malaria elimination.实现和维持消除疟疾的策略。
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1592-603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61269-X. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Costs and financial feasibility of malaria elimination.消除疟疾的成本和财务可行性。
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1604-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61355-4. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
3
Ranking of elimination feasibility between malaria-endemic countries.疟疾流行国家消除可行性排名。
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.
疟疾控制干预措施的成本和成本效益:系统文献综述。
Value Health. 2021 Aug;24(8):1213-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
The economics of malaria control and elimination: a systematic review.疟疾控制与消除的经济学:一项系统综述
Malar J. 2016 Dec 12;15(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1635-5.
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1579-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61301-3. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
4
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria.室内滞留喷洒预防疟疾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD006657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006657.pub2.
5
From malaria control to eradication: The WHO perspective.从疟疾控制到消除:世界卫生组织的观点。
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Jul;14(7):802-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02287.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
6
Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria.疟疾大规模病媒控制的成本与后果。
Malar J. 2008 Dec 17;7:258. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-258.
7
Towards a research agenda for global malaria elimination.迈向全球疟疾消除研究议程。
Malar J. 2008 Dec 11;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S1.
8
[Evaluation of usefulness of the panel test composed of malaria non-specific tests as a surrogate marker].[评估由疟疾非特异性检测组成的联合检测作为替代标志物的有用性]
Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Oct;28(5):332-8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.5.332.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of insecticide-treated net distribution as part of the Togo Integrated Child Health Campaign.作为多哥儿童综合健康运动一部分的经杀虫剂处理蚊帐分发的成本效益分析。
Malar J. 2008 Apr 29;7:73. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-73.
10
Malaria: progress, perils, and prospects for eradication.疟疾:根除的进展、风险与前景
J Clin Invest. 2008 Apr;118(4):1266-76. doi: 10.1172/JCI33996.