Fetics B, Nevo E, Chen C H, Kass D A
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Jun;46(6):698-706. doi: 10.1109/10.764946.
Aortic pressure can be estimated noninvasively by applying a transfer function (TF) to radial tonometry signals. This study compares the performance of prior approaches, based on Fourier transform and inverted aortic-to-radial model, with direct radial-to-aortic autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model. Simultaneous invasive aortic pressure and radial tonometry pressure were recorded during rest in 39 patients in the supine position. Individual radial-aortic TF's were estimated from 20 patients, and the average TF was used to predict aortic pressures in the remaining 19 patients. The direct average TF yielded accurate aortic systolic pressure estimation (error 0.4 +/- 2.9 mmHg) and good reproduction of the aortic pressure waveform (root mean squared error 2.2 +/- 0.9 mmHg). The inverted reverse TF (aortic radial) yielded comparable results, while the Fourier-based TF had worse performance. Individual direct TF provided improved predictive accuracy only for indexes which are based on higher frequency components of the waveform (augmentation index, systolic time period). An ARX average TF can be used to accurately estimate central aortic pressure waveform parameters from noninvasive radial pulse tracings, and its performance is superior to previous techniques.
通过将传递函数(TF)应用于桡动脉张力测量信号,可以无创地估计主动脉压力。本研究比较了基于傅里叶变换和反向主动脉-桡动脉模型的先前方法与直接桡动脉-主动脉自回归外生(ARX)模型的性能。在39例仰卧位休息的患者中同步记录有创主动脉压力和桡动脉张力测量压力。从20例患者中估计个体桡动脉-主动脉TF,并使用平均TF预测其余19例患者的主动脉压力。直接平均TF产生了准确的主动脉收缩压估计值(误差0.4±2.9 mmHg),并能很好地再现主动脉压力波形(均方根误差2.2±0.9 mmHg)。反向TF(主动脉-桡动脉)产生了类似的结果,而基于傅里叶的TF性能较差。个体直接TF仅对基于波形高频成分的指标(增强指数、收缩期时长)提供了更高的预测准确性。ARX平均TF可用于从无创桡动脉脉搏描记图中准确估计中心主动脉压力波形参数,其性能优于先前的技术。