Kaiser V, Kester A D, Stoffers H E, Kitslaar P J, Knottnerus J A
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999 Jul;18(1):25-9. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0843.
to estimate the intra-observer variability of the measurement of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure index (ABPI) and to compare the reproducibility of the measurements by experienced vascular laboratory assistants and by less-experienced general practice personnel.
repeated measurement of ABPI by general practitioners (GPs), GP-assistants and vascular laboratory assistants using a pocket Doppler device and a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
ABPI was measured in six patients with various degrees of PAOD by two experienced observers (vascular laboratory assistants) and by 24 less-experienced observers (18 practice assistants, six GPs).
the total number of measurements was 354. The overall intra-observer variability estimate was 11.8% ABPI. The intra-observer variability was 7.3% in the experienced observers and 12.0% in the less-experienced observers. The difference of variability between experienced and less-experienced observers was significant.
the ABPI is suitable in follow-up studies where repeated measurements are needed. Differences between measurements can be minimised by performing repeated measurements or by using more experienced observers.
评估踝肱收缩压指数(ABPI)测量的观察者内变异性,并比较经验丰富的血管实验室助手和经验较少的全科医疗人员测量结果的可重复性。
全科医生(GP)、GP助手和血管实验室助手使用袖珍多普勒装置和随机零点血压计对ABPI进行重复测量。
由两名经验丰富的观察者(血管实验室助手)和24名经验较少的观察者(18名实习助手、6名全科医生)对6例不同程度外周动脉疾病(PAOD)患者测量ABPI。
测量总数为354次。观察者内变异性总体估计为ABPI的11.8%。经验丰富的观察者观察者内变异性为7.3%,经验较少的观察者为12.0%。经验丰富和经验较少的观察者之间的变异性差异显著。
ABPI适用于需要重复测量的随访研究。通过进行重复测量或使用经验更丰富的观察者,可以将测量差异降至最低。