Anderson R C, Anderson J H
Anderson Laboratories, West Hartford, Vermont 05084, USA.
Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Apr-Jun;15(3-4):339-45. doi: 10.1177/074823379901500308.
Many of the symptoms described in Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) resemble the symptoms known to be elicited by airborne irritant chemicals. Irritation of the eye, nose, and throat is common to SBS, MCS, and sensory irritation (SI). Difficulty of breathing is often seen with SBS, MCS, and pulmonary irritation (PI). We therefore asked the question: can indoor air pollutants cause SI and/or PI? In laboratory testing in which mice breathed the dilute volatile emissions of air fresheners, fabric softeners, colognes, and mattresses for 1 h, we measured various combinations of SI and PI as well as airflow decreases (analogous to asthma attacks). Air samples taken from sites associated with repeated human complaints of poor air quality also caused SI, PI, and airflow limitation (AFL) in the mice. In previous publications, we have documented numerous behavior changes in mice (which we formally studied with a functional observational battery) after exposure to product emissions or complaint site air; neurological complaints are a prominent part of SBS and MCS. All together, these data suggest that many symptoms of SBS and MCS can be described as SI, PI, AFL, and neurotoxicity. All these problems can be caused by airborne irritant chemicals such as those emitted by common commercial products and found in polluted indoor air. With some chemical mixtures (e.g., emissions of some fabric softeners, disposable diapers, and vinyl mattress covers) but not others (e.g., emissions of a solid air freshener), the SI response became larger (2- to 4-fold) when we administered a series of two or three 1-h exposures over a 24-h period. Since with each exposure the intensity of the stimulus was constant yet the magnitude of the response increased, we concluded that there was a change in the sensitivity of the mice to these chemicals. The response was not a generalized stress response because it occurred with only some mixtures of irritants and not others; it is a specific response to certain mixtures of airborne chemicals. This is one of the few times in MCS research that one can actually measure both the intensity of the stimulus and the magnitude of the response and thus be allowed to discuss sensitivity changes. The changing SI response of the mice might serve as a model of how people develop increasing sensitivity to environmental pollutants. Intensive study of this system should teach us much about how people respond to and change sensitivity to airborne irritant chemicals.
许多在病态建筑综合征(SBS)和多重化学敏感性(MCS)中描述的症状类似于已知由空气中刺激性化学物质引发的症状。眼睛、鼻子和喉咙的刺激在SBS、MCS和感觉刺激(SI)中都很常见。呼吸困难在SBS、MCS和肺部刺激(PI)中也经常出现。因此,我们提出了一个问题:室内空气污染物会导致SI和/或PI吗?在实验室测试中,让小鼠呼吸空气清新剂、织物柔软剂、古龙水和床垫的稀释挥发性排放物1小时,我们测量了SI和PI的各种组合以及气流减少情况(类似于哮喘发作)。从与人类反复投诉空气质量差相关的地点采集的空气样本也在小鼠中导致了SI、PI和气流限制(AFL)。在之前的出版物中,我们记录了小鼠在接触产品排放物或投诉地点空气后出现的许多行为变化(我们用功能观察电池组进行了正式研究);神经方面的投诉是SBS和MCS的一个突出部分。总之,这些数据表明,SBS和MCS的许多症状可以描述为SI、PI、AFL和神经毒性。所有这些问题都可能由空气中的刺激性化学物质引起,比如常见商业产品排放的以及在污染的室内空气中发现的那些化学物质。对于某些化学混合物(例如某些织物柔软剂、一次性尿布和乙烯基床垫套的排放物)而非其他混合物(例如固体空气清新剂的排放物),当我们在24小时内进行两到三次每次1小时的暴露时,SI反应会变得更大(2到4倍)。由于每次暴露时刺激强度是恒定的,但反应幅度却增加了,我们得出结论,小鼠对这些化学物质的敏感性发生了变化。这种反应不是一种全身性应激反应,因为它只在某些刺激性混合物而非其他混合物中出现;它是对某些空气中化学物质混合物的特异性反应。这是MCS研究中少数几次能够实际测量刺激强度和反应幅度并因此能够讨论敏感性变化的情况之一。小鼠不断变化的SI反应可能作为一个模型,用于解释人们如何对环境污染物产生越来越高的敏感性。对这个系统的深入研究应该能让我们更多地了解人们如何对空气中的刺激性化学物质做出反应以及敏感性如何变化。