Suppr超能文献

拟除虫菊酯室内使用后的风险评估

Risk assessment of pyrethroids following indoor use.

作者信息

Pauluhn J

机构信息

Institute of Toxicology, BAYER AG, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 1996 Nov;88(1-3):339-48. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(96)03759-9.

Abstract

One notable form of toxicity associated with exposure to high concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids has been a cutaneous paresthesia. This strong excitatory action on the sense organs in the vertebrate skin and upper respiratory tract is characteristic of synthetic pyrethroids, whereas the cyano pyrethroids evoke more intense neuroexcitatory activities than the noncyano pyrethroids. Such facial sensations and irritative symptoms appear to be produced by direct stimulation of peripheral sensory nerve endings rather than by inflammatory mechanisms. Effects related to sensory irritation can be evoked by a wide variety of substances occurring in the indoor environment, and analysis of the etiopathological relationships presents difficult and complex medical and scientific issues. For the appropriate assessment of pyrethroids in the indoor environment, it would be helpful to have an objective laboratory assay to confirm and quantitate the degree of sensory irritation evoked by airborne pyrethroids. A bioassay was established using the nociceptive system of mice and rats to assess the extent of pyrethroid-related sensory irritation to the respiratory tract. For analysis, aerosolized Cyfluthrin was selected due to the greater potency of the alpha-cyano pyrethroids to evoke sensory irritation. Additionally, this pyrethroid was tested in a carpet-model to assess the extent to which pyrethroid-laden dust from carpets is likely to become airborne following continuous brushing. Comparative evaluations of the sensory irritation potential of aerosolized Cyfluthrin in mice and rats revealed that for assessment of the sensory irritant threshold concentration, rats appeared to be more susceptible than mice. Measurements performed repeatedly during subacute exposure to the pyrethroid (6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 consecutive weeks) did not indicate any alteration in responsiveness, and the magnitude of changes in breathing patterns was similar to those observed following acute 1-h exposure. These findings confirm the conclusion that alpha-cyano-pyrethroids appear to act as "pure" sensory irritants and that the effects observed are non-cumulative and transient in nature. Concomitant respiratory tract inflammation and ensuing changes in susceptibility-common findings in chemical sensory irritants-did not occur. From the studies addressing the dislodgeability of pyrethroid containing dust from carpets, it is apparent that measurement of deposited dust is a poor substitute for airborne dust. Even under worst-case testing conditions (continuous brushing of the carpet for approximately 19 h in a bias-flow compartment), only a very small fraction of the pyrethroid laden dust particles charged to the carpet could be recovered airborne (0.04%/m2 per h). Thus, experimental findings support the conclusion that such agents cannot be dislodged from carpets to an extent that toxicologically significant airborne concentrations are attained. Therefore, assessment of health hazards in the indoor environment based solely on "vacuum cleaner" sampling is prone to a high level of errors and misjudgment.

摘要

与接触高浓度合成拟除虫菊酯相关的一种显著毒性形式是皮肤感觉异常。这种对脊椎动物皮肤和上呼吸道感觉器官的强烈兴奋作用是合成拟除虫菊酯的特征,而氰基拟除虫菊酯比非氰基拟除虫菊酯引起更强烈的神经兴奋活动。这种面部感觉和刺激症状似乎是由外周感觉神经末梢的直接刺激而非炎症机制产生的。室内环境中多种物质都可引发与感觉刺激相关的效应,对其病因病理关系的分析存在困难且复杂的医学和科学问题。为了适当地评估室内环境中的拟除虫菊酯,拥有一种客观的实验室检测方法以确认和量化空气中拟除虫菊酯引起的感觉刺激程度会很有帮助。利用小鼠和大鼠的伤害感受系统建立了一种生物测定法,以评估拟除虫菊酯对呼吸道的感觉刺激程度。为了进行分析,由于α-氰基拟除虫菊酯引发感觉刺激的效力更强,所以选择了氟氯氰菊酯气雾剂。此外,在地毯模型中对这种拟除虫菊酯进行了测试,以评估地毯上含拟除虫菊酯的灰尘在持续刷洗后可能悬浮到空气中的程度。对小鼠和大鼠中氟氯氰菊酯气雾剂的感觉刺激潜力进行的比较评估表明,在评估感觉刺激阈值浓度时大鼠似乎比小鼠更敏感。在亚急性接触拟除虫菊酯期间(连续4周,每天6小时,每周5天)反复进行的测量未表明反应性有任何改变,呼吸模式的变化幅度与急性1小时接触后观察到的相似。这些发现证实了以下结论:α-氰基拟除虫菊酯似乎作为“纯粹”的感觉刺激物起作用,观察到的效应本质上是非累积性的且是短暂的。化学感觉刺激物常见的伴随呼吸道炎症及随后易感性的变化并未发生。从关于地毯上含拟除虫菊酯灰尘可去除性的研究来看,很明显沉积灰尘的测量不能很好地替代空气中的灰尘。即使在最坏情况的测试条件下(在偏流舱中对地毯连续刷洗约19小时),充入地毯的含拟除虫菊酯灰尘颗粒中只有极小一部分能悬浮到空气中(每小时每平方米0.04%)。因此,实验结果支持这样的结论:此类物质无法从地毯上大量去除从而达到具有毒理学意义的空气浓度。所以,仅基于“吸尘器”采样来评估室内环境中的健康危害容易出现高水平的误差和误判。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验