• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者足部保护性感觉检测的临床检查。国际临床检查研究合作组。

Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research.

作者信息

Smieja M, Hunt D L, Edelman D, Etchells E, Cornuz J, Simel D L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jul;14(7):418-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05208.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05208.x
PMID:10417599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1496604/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the reproducibility and accuracy of conventional clinical examination of the diabetic foot to monofilament examination. We also sought to simplify the monofilament examination by reducing it to fewer touch points.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study at 10 centers in the United States, Canada, and Switzerland, general internists and residents performed a structured history and physical examination for neuropathy on the feet of diabetic patients. Independent examination by two observers included monofilament sensation, pinprick, vibration, position sense, and ankle reflexes.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 304 patients were examined by at least one practitioner, and 200 received duplicate examinations. Monofilament examination and ankle reflexes had the best reproducibility, with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.59); pinprick, position, and vibration sense had fair agreement (kappa = 0.28-0.36). No component of the history or physical examination, singly or in aggregate, was both sensitive and specific for identifying a patient with an abnormal monofilament examination. A simplified monofilament examination using only 4 sites per foot (total 8 sites) detected 90% of patients with an abnormal 16-site monofilament evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional clinical examination had low reproducibility and correlated poorly with monofilament examination for the identification of the at-risk patient. The Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination, a reproducible, valid, and generalizable test of foot sensation, is recommended as the screening procedure of choice for examining diabetic feet.

摘要

目的

我们比较了糖尿病足常规临床检查与单丝检查的可重复性和准确性。我们还试图通过减少接触点数量来简化单丝检查。

方法

在美国、加拿大和瑞士的10个中心进行的一项横断面研究中,普通内科医生和住院医师对糖尿病患者的足部进行了结构化病史和神经病变体格检查。由两名观察者进行的独立检查包括单丝感觉、针刺觉、振动觉、位置觉和踝反射。

主要结果

至少一名医生对304例患者进行了检查,其中200例接受了重复检查。单丝检查和踝反射的可重复性最佳,一致性中等(kappa = 0.59);针刺觉、位置觉和振动觉的一致性一般(kappa = 0.28 - 0.36)。病史或体格检查的任何单项或综合组成部分,对于识别单丝检查异常的患者,既不敏感也不特异。一种简化的单丝检查,每只脚仅使用4个部位(共8个部位),检测出了90%在16部位单丝评估中异常的患者。

结论

常规临床检查的可重复性较低,在识别高危患者方面与单丝检查的相关性较差。Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查是一种可重复、有效且可推广的足部感觉测试,推荐作为检查糖尿病足的首选筛查方法。

相似文献

1
Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research.糖尿病患者足部保护性感觉检测的临床检查。国际临床检查研究合作组。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jul;14(7):418-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05208.x.
2
Monofilament assessment of neuropathy in a community diabetes clinic.社区糖尿病诊所中神经病变的单丝评估
S Afr Med J. 2002 Sep;92(9):715-9.
3
Interpreting the results of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test: accounting for false-positive answers in the international consensus on the diabetic foot protocol by a new model.解读 Semmes-Weinstein 单丝试验的结果:通过新模型解释糖尿病足国际共识协议中假阳性答案的问题。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 Jan;30(1):77-80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2465.
4
The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy severe enough to cause a loss of protective sensation in a population-based sample of people with known and newly detected diabetes in Barbados: a cross-sectional study.巴巴多斯基于人群的已知和新诊断糖尿病患者样本中足以导致保护性感觉丧失的周围神经病变的流行率:一项横断面研究。
Diabet Med. 2019 Dec;36(12):1629-1636. doi: 10.1111/dme.13989. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients.第一跖骨头下方4.5克单丝感觉表明糖尿病患者足部有保护性感觉。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):717-23. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00008.
6
Sensory thresholds of normal human feet.正常人类足部的感觉阈值。
Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Jun;21(6):501-4. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100609.
7
Pilot study on the significance of random intrasite placement of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament.随机单点 Semmes-Weinstein 单丝放置意义的初步研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013 Mar;29(3):235-8. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2388.
8
The utility of Vibratip in accurate identification of loss of protective sensation in the contralateral foot of patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer.Vibratip 在准确识别伴有糖尿病足溃疡患者对侧足部保护性感觉丧失方面的效用。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):857-862. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
9
Reliability and responsiveness of an 18 site, 10-g monofilament examination for assessment of protective foot sensation.18 点 10 克单丝检查评估保护性足部感觉的可靠性和反应性。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2011 Apr-Jun;34(2):95-8. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e31820aabe5.
10
Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study.传统方法与足部风险定量感觉测试的比较:鹿特丹糖尿病足研究结果
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar;139(3):752e-763e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003047.

引用本文的文献

1
Microvascular, Biochemical, and Clinical Impact of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Recalcitrant Diabetic Foot Ulcers.高压氧疗法对顽固性糖尿病足溃疡的微血管、生化及临床影响
Cells. 2025 Aug 4;14(15):1196. doi: 10.3390/cells14151196.
2
Improvement in Protective Sensation: Clinical Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial for Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation.保护性感觉的改善:一项关于采用10kHz脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的随机对照试验的临床证据
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 9:19322968231222271. doi: 10.1177/19322968231222271.
3
Pay-for-performance and continuity of care synergistically reduced amputation of lower extremity in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.按效付费和连续性护理协同作用降低了糖尿病患者下肢截肢的发生率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08075-2.
4
Diabetic foot ulcer in Southern Jordan: A cross-sectional Study of Clinical and Microbiological Aspects.约旦南部的糖尿病足溃疡:临床与微生物学方面的横断面研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 2;76:103552. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103552. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Reliability of recommended non-invasive chairside screening tests for diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review with meta-analyses.推荐的用于糖尿病相关周围神经病变的非侵入性椅旁筛查试验的可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002528.
6
Validity of Instrumented 360° Turn Test in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.仪器化360°转身测试在认知障碍老年人中的有效性
Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2021;38(2):170-184. doi: 10.1080/02703181.2019.1710319. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
What Is the Diagnosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who Have a Painful Shoulder? Results from a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.2型糖尿病合并肩部疼痛患者的诊断是什么?一项前瞻性横断面研究的结果。
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 18;9(12):4097. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124097.
8
Clinical Features and Rules of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients.糖尿病周围神经病变患者的临床特征及中药规律
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Jul 17;2020:5795264. doi: 10.1155/2020/5795264. eCollection 2020.
9
Vitamin B Deficiency and Foot Ulcers in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Case-Control Study.2型糖尿病患者维生素B缺乏与足部溃疡:一项病例对照研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 Dec 6;12:2589-2596. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S233683. eCollection 2019.
10
Concurrent Validity of Postural Sway Measures in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.认知障碍老年人姿势晃动测量的同时效度
Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2018;36(4):399-410. doi: 10.1080/02703181.2018.1556231. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study.糖尿病足溃疡危险因素的前瞻性研究。西雅图糖尿病足研究。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Jul;22(7):1036-42. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.7.1036.
2
Reproducibility and accuracy among primary care providers of a screening examination for foot ulcer risk among diabetic patients.糖尿病患者足部溃疡风险筛查检查中基层医疗服务提供者之间的可重复性和准确性。
Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):274-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0263.
3
Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme.糖尿病足筛查与防护项目评估
Diabet Med. 1998 Jan;15(1):80-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199801)15:1<80::AID-DIA517>3.0.CO;2-K.
4
Risk factors for diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy. Results of the Seattle Prospective Diabetic Foot Study.糖尿病周围感觉神经病变的危险因素。西雅图前瞻性糖尿病足研究结果。
Diabetes Care. 1997 Jul;20(7):1162-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.7.1162.
5
The assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy in daily clinical practice: reproducibility and validity of Semmes Weinstein monofilaments examination and clinical neurological examination.日常临床实践中糖尿病性多发性神经病变的评估:Semmes Weinstein单丝检查和临床神经学检查的可重复性及有效性
Muscle Nerve. 1997 Jan;20(1):116-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199701)20:1<116::aid-mus19>3.0.co;2-2.
6
Preventive treatment of foot deformities in type 1 diabetic patients aged 15-50 years--an epidemiological and prospective study.15至50岁1型糖尿病患者足部畸形的预防性治疗——一项流行病学及前瞻性研究
J Intern Med. 1996 Oct;240(4):219-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1996.37866000.x.
7
Diabetes and the nervous system.糖尿病与神经系统。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996 Jun;25(2):325-59. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70327-3.
8
Screening for patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration in a general diabetic outpatient clinic.在普通糖尿病门诊筛查糖尿病足溃疡风险患者。
Diabet Med. 1996 Jun;13(6):561-3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199606)13:6<561::AID-DIA112>3.0.CO;2-P.
9
Identifying patients with diabetes mellitus who are at risk for lower-extremity complications: use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.识别有下肢并发症风险的糖尿病患者:使用Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查
Phys Ther. 1996 Jan;76(1):68-71. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.1.68.
10
Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。III. 如何使用一篇关于诊断试验的文章。B. 结果是什么,它们对我照顾患者有帮助吗?循证医学工作组。
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703.