Lefevre F, Reifler D, Lee P, Sbenghe M, Nwadiaro N, Verma S, Yarnold P R
Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill. 60611, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jul;14(7):425-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07238.x.
To define the prevalence and detection rates of mental disorders among high utilizers as compared with typical utilizers, and to examine the effect of case-mix adjustment on these parameters.
Cross-sectional study.
General internal medicine outpatient clinic associated with an urban, academic medical center.
From patients attending a general medicine clinic, 304 were selected randomly in three utilization groups, defined by number of clinic visits: (1) high utilizers; (2) case-mix adjusted high utilizers; and (3) typical utilizers (control patients).
None.
The presence of any mental disorder was ascertained by the PRIME-MD screening instrument. Chart review on all patients was performed to ascertain mental disorders detected by primary care physicians. The prevalence of mood disorders was markedly higher in high utilizers (29%) than in adjusted high utilizers (15%) or controls (10%) (p <.001). Anxiety disorders were slightly, but not statistically, more prevalent in the group adjusted for case mix (16%) than in other high utilizers (12%) or controls (9%). Alcoholism was significantly more prevalent in controls (12%) than in adjusted (6%) or other high utilizers (3%) (p <.03). The discrepancy in detection rates between PRIME-MD and chart review for any mental disorder was less for high utilizers (37% vs 31%) as compared with adjusted high utilizers (31% vs 11%) or controls (24% vs 8%).
Mood disorders are associated with a high overall burden of illness, while anxiety disorders are more predominant among outliers after case-mix adjustment. Detection rates differ substantially by utilization pattern. Screening efforts can be more appropriately targeted with knowledge of these patterns.
确定高就诊率者与典型就诊者相比精神障碍的患病率和检出率,并研究病例组合调整对这些参数的影响。
横断面研究。
与一所城市学术医疗中心相关的普通内科门诊。
从普通内科门诊的患者中,根据门诊就诊次数分为三个就诊率组,随机选取304例患者:(1)高就诊率者;(2)病例组合调整后的高就诊率者;(3)典型就诊者(对照患者)。
无。
采用PRIME-MD筛查工具确定是否存在任何精神障碍。对所有患者进行病历审查,以确定初级保健医生检测到的精神障碍。高就诊率者中情绪障碍的患病率(29%)明显高于病例组合调整后的高就诊率者(15%)或对照组(10%)(p<.001)。病例组合调整组中焦虑障碍的患病率(16%)略高于其他高就诊率者(12%)或对照组(9%),但无统计学差异。对照组中酒精中毒的患病率(12%)明显高于病例组合调整后的高就诊率者(6%)或其他高就诊率者(3%)(p<.03)。与病例组合调整后的高就诊率者(31%对11%)或对照组(24%对8%)相比,高就诊率者中PRIME-MD与病历审查在任何精神障碍检出率上的差异较小(37%对31%)。
情绪障碍与较高的总体疾病负担相关,而焦虑障碍在病例组合调整后的异常值中更为突出。检出率因就诊模式而异。了解这些模式后,筛查工作可以更有针对性地进行。