Pearson S D, Katzelnick D J, Simon G E, Manning W G, Helstad C P, Henk H J
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Aug;14(8):461-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.06278.x.
To determine the prevalence of unrecognized or unsuccessfully treated depression among high utilizers of medical care, and to describe the relation between depression, medical comorbidities, and resource utilization.
Survey.
Three HMOs located in different geographic regions of the United States.
A total of 12,773 HMO members were identified as high utilizers. Eligibility criteria for depression screening were met by 10,461 patients.
Depression status was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition. Depression screening was completed in 7,203 patients who were high utilizers of medical care, of whom 1,465 (20.3%) screened positive for current major depression or major depression in partial remission. Among depressed patients, 621 (42.4%) had had a visit with a mental health specialist or a diagnosis of depression or both within the previous 2 years. The prevalence of well-defined medical conditions was the same in patients with and patients without evidence of depression (41.5% vs 41.5%, p = .87). However, high-utilizing patients who had not made a visit for a nonspecific complaint during the previous 2 years were at significantly lower risk of depression (13.1% vs 22.4%, p < .001). Patients with current depression or depression in partial remission had significantly higher numbers of annual office visits and hospital days per 1,000 than patients without depression.
Although there was evidence that mental health problems had previously been recognized in many of the patients, a large percentage of high utilizers still suffered from active depression that either went unrecognized or was not being treated successfully. Patients who had not made visits for nonspecific complaints were at significantly lower risk of depression. Depression among high utilizers was associated with higher resource utilization.
确定医疗高利用率人群中未被识别或治疗未成功的抑郁症患病率,并描述抑郁症、合并症与资源利用之间的关系。
调查。
位于美国不同地理区域的三家健康维护组织(HMO)。
共识别出12773名HMO成员为高利用率人群。10461名患者符合抑郁症筛查的资格标准。
采用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版的结构化临床访谈评估抑郁状态。对7203名医疗高利用率患者完成了抑郁症筛查,其中1465名(20.3%)目前患有重度抑郁症或部分缓解的重度抑郁症筛查呈阳性。在抑郁症患者中,621名(42.4%)在过去2年内曾就诊于心理健康专家或被诊断为抑郁症或两者皆有。有抑郁症证据和无抑郁症证据的患者中明确的医疗状况患病率相同(41.5%对41.5%,p = 0.87)。然而,在过去2年内未因非特异性主诉就诊的高利用率患者患抑郁症的风险显著较低(13.1%对22.4%,p < 0.001)。与无抑郁症患者相比,目前患有抑郁症或部分缓解的抑郁症患者每1000人的年度门诊就诊次数和住院天数显著更多。
尽管有证据表明许多患者之前已被识别出存在心理健康问题,但仍有很大比例的高利用率人群患有活动性抑郁症,要么未被识别,要么治疗未成功。未因非特异性主诉就诊的患者患抑郁症的风险显著较低。高利用率人群中的抑郁症与更高的资源利用相关。