Larson J L, Covey M K, Wirtz S E, Berry J K, Alex C G, Langbein W E, Edwards L
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;160(2):500-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9804067.
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) the intensity of aerobic training is limited by dyspnea. Improving strength of the inspiratory muscles could enhance aerobic exercise training by reducing exercise-related dyspnea. We examined effects of home-based inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and cycle ergometry training (CET) in 53 patients with moderate to severe COPD (FEV(1)% pred, 50 +/- 17 [mean +/- SD]). Patients were randomly assigned to 4 mo of training in one of four groups: IMT, CET, CET + IMT, or health education (ED). Patients were encouraged to train to the limits of their dyspnea. Inspiratory muscle strength and endurance increased in IMT and CET + IMT groups compared with CET and ED groups (p < 0. 01). Peak oxygen uptake increased and heart rate, minute ventilation, dyspnea, and leg fatigue decreased at submaximal work rates in the CET and CET + IMT groups compared with the IMT and ED groups (p < 0. 01). There were no differences between the CET and CET + IMT groups. Home-based CET produced a physiological training effect and reduced exercise-related symptoms while IMT increased respiratory muscle strength and endurance. The combination of CET and IMT did not produce additional benefits in exercise performance and exercise-related symptoms. This is the first study to demonstrate a physiological training effect with home-based exercise training.
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,有氧运动训练的强度受呼吸困难的限制。增强吸气肌力量可通过减轻与运动相关的呼吸困难来加强有氧运动训练。我们研究了居家吸气肌训练(IMT)和周期测力计训练(CET)对53例中重度COPD患者(预计第一秒用力呼气容积百分比[FEV(1)% pred],50±17[均值±标准差])的影响。患者被随机分配至四组中的一组,进行为期4个月的训练:IMT组、CET组、CET + IMT组或健康教育组(ED组)。鼓励患者训练至呼吸困难的极限。与CET组和ED组相比,IMT组和CET + IMT组的吸气肌力量和耐力增加(p<0.01)。与IMT组和ED组相比,CET组和CET + IMT组在次最大运动强度时的峰值摄氧量增加,心率、分钟通气量、呼吸困难和腿部疲劳减轻(p<0.01)。CET组和CET + IMT组之间无差异。居家CET产生了生理训练效果并减轻了与运动相关的症状,而IMT增加了呼吸肌力量和耐力。CET与IMT联合应用在运动表现和与运动相关的症状方面未产生额外益处。这是第一项证明居家运动训练具有生理训练效果的研究。