Goodman R
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):791-9.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that asks about children's and teenagers' symptoms and positive attributes; the extended version also includes an impact supplement that asks if the respondent thinks the young person has a problem, and if so, enquires further about chronicity, distress, social impairment, and burden for others. Closely similar versions are completed by parents, teachers, and young people aged 11 or more. The validation study involved two groups of 5-15-year-olds: a community sample (N = 467) and a psychiatric clinic sample (N = 232). The two groups had markedly different distributions on the measures of perceived difficulties, impact (distress plus social impairment), and burden. Impact scores were better than symptom scores at discriminating between the community and clinic samples; discrimination based on the single "Is there a problem?" item was almost as good. The SDQ burden rating correlated well (r = .74) with a standardised interview rating of burden. For clinicians and researchers with an interest in psychiatric caseness and the determinants of service use, the impact supplement of the extended SDQ appears to provide useful additional information without taking up much more of respondents' time.
优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一份简短的行为筛查问卷,用于询问儿童和青少年的症状及积极特质;扩展版还包括一个影响补充部分,询问受访者是否认为该年轻人存在问题,如果是,则进一步询问问题的持续性、困扰程度、社会功能损害以及对他人的负担。父母、教师以及11岁及以上的青少年会填写非常相似的版本。验证研究涉及两组5至15岁的儿童:一组社区样本(N = 467)和一组精神科门诊样本(N = 232)。两组在感知到的困难、影响(困扰加上社会功能损害)和负担的测量指标上分布明显不同。在区分社区样本和门诊样本方面,影响得分比症状得分更好;基于单一的“是否存在问题?”项目进行区分的效果几乎同样好。SDQ负担评分与标准化访谈的负担评分相关性良好(r = 0.74)。对于关注精神疾病情况及服务使用决定因素的临床医生和研究人员而言,扩展版SDQ的影响补充部分似乎能提供有用的额外信息,且不会占用受访者太多时间。