Meyer C, Le J V, Rohr S, Thiry L C, Duclos B, Reimund J M, Baumann R
Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale, d'Urgence et de Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg-Hautepierre, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Surg Endosc. 1999 Sep;13(9):874-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649901123.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the reference treatment for biliary lithiasis, but the management strategy for common bile duct stones (CBDS) remains a subject of controversy in the absence of an established consensus. While conventional surgery remains the reference treatment for CBDS, minimally invasive techniques are becoming more and more popular. These methods consist of the extraction of the common bile duct stones either exclusively by laparoscopy or by sequential treatment with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) followed by LC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of CBDS in a one-stage operation by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and perioperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Between January 1994 and March 1998, 44 patients, 20 male and 24 female, (sex ratio 1.2) with a median age of 57 years (range 28-84 years) were treated for suspected or confirmed CBDS. The CBDS were uncomplicated in 39 cases (88%) and associated with a complication in 5 cases (12%), namely, cholangitis (2 cases) or acute pancreatitis (3 cases). The perioperative ES was performed immediately after the LC during the same operative time, with perioperative cholangiography being systematically performed (1 failure). In 6 cases, a transcystic drain was left in place (to ensure complete evacuation of the CBDS postoperatively) when there were more than three stones and/or when they were larger than 6 mm. The patient was positioned in the left lateral position in order to perform the ES.
Mean operative time for LC was 60 min, range 40-90 min. The general anesthesia was prolonged by 40 min in order to perform an ES (range 30-60 min). The perioperative ES was unsuccessful in one case (2%), due to the impossibility of catheterizing the papilla, the preoperative MR cholangiogram being normal. Immediate clearance of the CBD was achieved in 95% of the cases (42 p). In 2 cases, residual stone was found in the sixth day after cholangiography and was spontaneously evacuated as shown by 21st-day control. There was no mortality or postoperative complications. The duration of the postoperative hospitalization was 4.6 days (range 3-6).
We believe that LC combined with perioperative ES is a quick, reliable, and safe technique for the treatment of CBDS during a single operative procedure, although this approach is limited by the proximity and availability of an endoscopic team.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已成为胆石症的标准治疗方法,但在缺乏既定共识的情况下,胆总管结石(CBDS)的管理策略仍存在争议。虽然传统手术仍是CBDS的标准治疗方法,但微创技术越来越受欢迎。这些方法包括单纯通过腹腔镜或通过内镜括约肌切开术(ES)序贯治疗后再行LC来取出胆总管结石。本研究的目的是评估通过腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和围手术期内镜括约肌切开术进行一期手术治疗CBDS的效果。
1994年1月至1998年3月期间,44例患者(男性20例,女性24例,性别比1.2),中位年龄57岁(范围28 - 84岁),因疑似或确诊CBDS接受治疗。39例(88%)CBDS无并发症,5例(12%)合并并发症,即胆管炎(2例)或急性胰腺炎(3例)。围手术期ES在LC后同一手术时间内立即进行,系统地进行围手术期胆管造影(1例失败)。6例患者在结石超过3枚和/或结石大于6 mm时留置经胆囊引流管(以确保术后胆总管结石完全排出)。患者取左侧卧位以便进行ES。
LC的平均手术时间为60分钟,范围40 - 90分钟。为进行ES全身麻醉延长40分钟(范围30 - 60分钟)。围手术期ES有1例(2%)未成功,原因是无法插入乳头导管,术前磁共振胆胰管造影正常。95%的病例(42例)实现了胆总管的即时清除。2例患者在胆管造影后第6天发现残留结石,21天复查显示结石已自行排出。无死亡病例或术后并发症。术后住院时间为4.6天(范围3 - 6天)。
我们认为,LC联合围手术期ES是一种在单一手术过程中治疗CBDS的快速、可靠且安全的技术,尽管这种方法受内镜团队的临近程度和可用性限制。