Department of Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2454-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2757-7. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
Conducting preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (POES) versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES).
We searched multiple electronic databases for prospective, randomized, controlled trials related to safety and effectiveness of POES versus IOES. Relative risk ratios (RRs) were estimated with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. We considered the following outcomes: clearance rate, postprocedural complications, and hospital stay.
Five trials with 631 patients (318 with POES, 313 with IOES) were analyzed. Although the overall rates of common bile duct stone clearance were similar between POES and IOES (RR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.91-1.01; p = 0.13), the failure rate of common bile duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was significantly higher for IOES (RR 2.54, 95 % CI 1.23-5.26; p = 0.01). The pooled RR after POES for overall complication rates was similar to that for IOES (RR 1.56, 95 % CI 0.94-2.59; p = 0.09). However, compared with IOES, the RR risk of ERCP-related complications was significantly higher for POES (RR 2.27, 95 % CI 1.18-4.40, p = 0.01), especially in the patients at high risk of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis. There was no significant difference in morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy or required subsequent open surgery between the two groups. In the subgroup analyses, the RR risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis were significantly higher for POES (RR 4.85, 95 % CI 1.41-16.66, p = 0.01), and mean hospital stay was longer in the POES group (RR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.98-246; p < 0.01). However, the rates of bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, cholecystitis, and gastric ulceration did not differ significantly between POES and IOES.
With regard to the stone clearance and overall complication rates, POES is equal to IOES in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones. However, IOES is associated with a reduced incidence of ERCP-related pancreatitis and results in a shorter hospital stay.
在患有胆囊和疑似胆总管结石的患者中进行术前内镜下括约肌切开术(POES)与术中内镜下括约肌切开术(IOES)仍存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估 POES 与 IOES 的安全性和有效性。
我们检索了多个电子数据库,以查找有关 POES 与 IOES 安全性和有效性的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。基于意向治疗分析,使用 95%置信区间(CI)估计相对风险比(RR)。我们考虑了以下结果:清除率、术后并发症和住院时间。
对 5 项包含 631 名患者的试验(POES 组 318 名,IOES 组 313 名)进行了分析。尽管 POES 和 IOES 的胆总管结石总体清除率相似(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.91-1.01;p = 0.13),但 IOES 时内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中胆总管插管失败率明显更高(RR 2.54,95%CI 1.23-5.26;p = 0.01)。POES 术后总体并发症发生率的 RR 与 IOES 相似(RR 1.56,95%CI 0.94-2.59;p = 0.09)。然而,与 IOES 相比,POES 的 ERCP 相关并发症的 RR 风险明显更高(RR 2.27,95%CI 1.18-4.40,p = 0.01),特别是在易发生 ERCP 后胰腺炎的患者中。两组患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的发病率或后续开腹手术的发生率均无显著差异。在亚组分析中,POES 的 ERCP 后胰腺炎 RR 风险显著更高(RR 4.85,95%CI 1.41-16.66,p = 0.01),POES 组的平均住院时间更长(RR 2.22,95%CI 1.98-246;p < 0.01)。然而,POES 和 IOES 之间的出血、穿孔、胆管炎、胆囊炎和胃溃疡发生率无显著差异。
在患有胆囊和胆总管结石的患者中,就结石清除率和总体并发症发生率而言,POES 与 IOES 相当。然而,IOES 与 ERCP 相关胰腺炎发生率降低和住院时间缩短有关。