Suppr超能文献

精神病的社会人际维度。

Social interpersonal dimensions of the psychoses.

作者信息

Lindsay J S

出版信息

Med Hypotheses. 1999 Apr;52(4):335-47. doi: 10.1054/mehy.1997.0636.

Abstract

This paper looks at the patterns for the creation and social management of insanity and the involvements of those concerned. It describes an interaction model with people in a social reality of everyday living, built up of and defined by 'subjective' definitions of a situation. The psychiatric profession, involved in their conventional medical one-to-one confidential consultations with their patients, fails to be informed about the societal dimensions with two, three or more members as first described by Simmel (1902) (1). The differences are traditional, 'Two is company' and 'Three is a crowd'. If one of the possible two-person relationships in a family develops some emotional change to define itself as 'Two is company', this may alter the emotional balance in the whole family and may lead to 'split minds' (schizo/phrenia) and involving relationships with and between other family members. The arrival of the first baby changes two to three and creates 'Our Family'. 'Two is company: but it is not our family.' 'Three is a crowd' but now, with three possible pairs, who is the odd one to be left out, or to push in or be pushed out? This is proposed as the interpersonal relationships substrate of the manic-(push in) or depressive (pushed out) psychoses in an older family generation. Both propositions are to be developed using probability theory to define the number of members, the corresponding numbers of their possible kinetic interpersonal relationships, their social dynamism probabilities, and potential outcomes involving modern non-linear mathematics. These patients are described as 'not themselves' or 'beside themselves'. Those who are themselves but described as neurotic or psychopathic will also be mentioned.

摘要

本文探讨了精神错乱的产生及社会管理模式,以及相关各方的参与情况。它描述了一种与日常生活社会现实中的人们的互动模式,这种模式由对一种情况的“主观”定义构建而成并由此界定。精神病学专业人员在与患者进行传统的一对一保密咨询时,未能了解到西美尔(1902 年)首次描述的涉及两个、三个或更多成员的社会层面(1)。差异在于传统观念,“两人成伴”和“三人成群”。如果家庭中可能的两人关系之一发生了某种情感变化,将自身定义为“两人成伴”,这可能会改变整个家庭的情感平衡,并可能导致“精神分裂”(精神分裂症/偏执型精神障碍),并涉及与其他家庭成员之间的关系。第一个孩子的出生使两人变成三人,创造了“我们的家庭”。“两人成伴:但这不是我们的家庭。”“三人成群”,但现在,有了三对可能的组合,谁会是被排除在外、被挤入或被挤出的那个异类呢?这被认为是老年家庭一代中躁狂症(挤入)或抑郁症(被挤出)精神病的人际关系基础。这两个命题都将运用概率论来展开,以确定成员数量、他们可能的动态人际关系数量、他们的社会活力概率以及涉及现代非线性数学的潜在结果。这些患者被描述为“不像自己”或“失常”。那些正常但被描述为神经质或精神变态的人也会被提及。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验