Cawte S A, Pearson D, Green D J, Maslanka W B, Miller C G, Rogers A T
Department of Radiology, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1999 Apr;72(856):354-62. doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.856.10474496.
Large, multicentre clinical trials using DXA to monitor bone density following intervention are now common. At the same time, several different bone densitometers and calibration phantoms are currently in use. The aim of this study was to document the technical information required on cross-calibration of equipment, reproducibility and patient dose before commencing a multicentre clinical trial. To this end, we obtained an in vitro and in vivo cross-calibration of two machines (a Hologic QDR 2000 and a Lunar DPX-L) that were not significantly different. Interobserver and intraobserver precision, and radiation dose were also measured and three commonly used phantoms assessed for their usefulness in cross-calibration and quality assurance. Measured in vitro precision on the two machines (0.3-0.7%) was better than that specified by the manufacturers. In vivo precision was worse (1.4-2.1%), as might be expected in patients with reduced bone mass. Mean entrance skin radiation doses on each machine were 280 microSv for the QDR 2000 and 38 microSv for the DPX-L. No one phantom is ideal, but the European Spine Phantom or Lunar Aluminium Spine Phantom will provide an adequate cross-calibration for a clinical trial. This study demonstrates that an adequate cross-calibration can be obtained for use in groups of patients and that the equipment used is reproducible with a low radiation output.
目前,使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)在干预后监测骨密度的大型多中心临床试验很常见。与此同时,目前有几种不同的骨密度仪和校准体模在使用。本研究的目的是记录在开展多中心临床试验前,设备交叉校准、再现性和患者剂量方面所需的技术信息。为此,我们对两台无显著差异的仪器(一台Hologic QDR 2000和一台Lunar DPX-L)进行了体外和体内交叉校准。还测量了观察者间和观察者内的精密度以及辐射剂量,并评估了三种常用体模在交叉校准和质量保证方面的实用性。两台仪器的体外测量精密度(0.3 - 0.7%)优于制造商规定的值。体内精密度较差(1.4 - 2.1%),这在骨量减少的患者中是可以预期的。QDR 2000每台仪器的平均皮肤入口辐射剂量为280微希沃特,DPX-L为38微希沃特。没有一个体模是理想的,但欧洲脊柱体模或Lunar铝制脊柱体模可为临床试验提供充分的交叉校准。本研究表明,可获得适用于患者群体的充分交叉校准,且所使用的设备具有低辐射输出的再现性。