Gaining informed consent for screening. Is difficult--but many misconceptions need to be undone.
作者信息
Austoker J
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):722-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.722.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Gaining informed consent for screening. Is difficult--but many misconceptions need to be undone.获得筛查的知情同意书很难——但许多误解需要消除。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):722-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.722.
2
Screening for prostate cancer. How can patients give informed consent?前列腺癌筛查。患者如何给予知情同意？
Can Fam Physician. 1993 Nov;39:2385-90.
3
Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?心血管风险筛查：是公共卫生的当务之急还是个人知情选择的问题？
BMJ. 2002 Jul 13;325(7355):78-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.78.
4
Screening, ethics, and the law.筛查、伦理与法律。
BMJ. 1992 Aug 1;305(6848):267-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6848.267.
5
Informed consent. From bodily invasion to the seemingly mundane.知情同意。从身体侵入到看似平常之事。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 24;156(12):1262-3. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.12.1262.
6
The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.知情同意对患者进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查意愿的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 24;156(12):1333-6.
7
Informed choice and diabetes screening in primary care: qualitative study of patient and professional views in deprived areas of England.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2009 May;3(2):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 22.
8
[Is informed consent actually possible?].
Ther Umsch. 2006 Nov;63(11):699-702. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.63.11.699.
9
Informed consent for PSA testing.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1995 Fall;9(3):6-8.
10
Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening.程序制定、选择和父母对接受新生儿足跟血筛查决定的反思。
J Med Ethics. 2012 May;38(5):299-303. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100040. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
引用本文的文献
1
General practitioners' views and experiences of communicating with older people about cancer screening: a qualitative study.全科医生对老年人进行癌症筛查沟通的看法和经验：一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):543-553. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac126.
2
Newborn Screening: Review of its Impact for Cystinosis.新生儿筛查：胱氨酸病影响回顾。
Cells. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1109. doi: 10.3390/cells11071109.
3
Crowd-figure-pictograms improve women's knowledge about mammography screening: results from a randomised controlled trial.人群数字象形图可提高女性对乳腺钼靶筛查的认识：一项随机对照试验的结果
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 21;11(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3437-z.
4
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.决策辅助工具能否改善乳房X光检查筛查中的知情选择？一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0210-5.
5
Screening: The information individuals need to support their decision: per protocol analysis is better than intention-to-treat analysis at quantifying potential benefits and harms of screening.筛查：个体做出决策所需的信息：在量化筛查的潜在益处和危害方面，符合方案分析优于意向性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 28;15:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-28.
6
Construction of knowledge and perception of mammography in the UK.英国乳腺钼靶摄影的知识构建与认知
Ecancermedicalscience. 2008;2:98. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.98. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
7
Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening.公众对传播肠癌筛查信息的看法。
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):16-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00474.x.
8
Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation.筛查的知情选择：对评估的影响
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1148-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1148.
9
Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.对癌症预防建议的感知模糊性：与对癌症可预防性、风险及担忧的认知之间的关系。
J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1(0 1):51-69. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637541.
本文引用的文献
1
Bridging the knowledge gap and communicating uncertainties for informed consent in cervical cytology screening; we need unbiased information and a culture change.弥合知识差距并传达不确定性以实现宫颈细胞学筛查中的知情同意；我们需要无偏见的信息和文化变革。
Cytopathology. 1999 Aug;10(4):221-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00198.x.
2
Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review.知情决策：一份带注释的参考文献目录及系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(1):1-156.
3
Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.接受进一步乳房筛查检查的女性会遭受不良心理影响吗？一项多中心随访研究，比较了不同乳房筛查结果组在其最后一次乳房筛查预约五个月后的情况。
J Public Health Med. 1998 Dec;20(4):396-403. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024793.
4
Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it.基于证据的患者信息很重要，因此需要有一项国家战略来确保这一点。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):225-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.225.
5
Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies.基于证据的患者选择。让患者参与医疗技术决策的实际问题。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Spring;14(2):212-25. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012204.
6
New tests in cervical screening.
Lancet. 1998 Jan 24;351(9098):297. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78229-5.
7
Informed participation in screening is essential.知情参与筛查至关重要。
BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1762-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1762a.
8
Supporting consumer involvement in decision making: what constitutes quality in consumer health information?
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):425-37. doi: 10.1016/s1353-4505(96)00062-2.
9
Public understanding of medical screening.公众对医学筛查的理解。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):224-7. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200410.
10
Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for?宫颈涂片异常的检出率：我们在筛查什么？
Lancet. 1995 Jun 10;345(8963):1469-73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91036-0.
Zotero 插件