Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it.
作者信息
Coulter A
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):225-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.225.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it.基于证据的患者信息很重要，因此需要有一项国家战略来确保这一点。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):225-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.225.
2
[Risk of disinformation on the Internet. Quality labeling of medical websites is tested].[互联网上虚假信息的风险。对医学网站的质量标签进行测试]
Lakartidningen. 1999 Apr 7;96(14):1737-40.
3
[Evidence-based medicine, dissemination of research information and the role of the medical journal].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000 Sep 22;125(38):1119-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7574.
4
Quality of Web-based information on depression.基于网络的抑郁症信息质量。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Sep;27(9):852-8. doi: 10.1002/da.20665.
5
6
The Cancer Information Service Telephone Evaluation and Reporting System (CISTERS): a new tool for assessing quality assurance.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993(14):61-5.
7
Evidence-based consumerism.循证消费主义
Health Forum J. 2001 Jul-Aug;44(4):44.
8
Centre for Health Information Quality.健康信息质量中心
Evid Based Dent. 2004;5(4):108-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400289.
9
Incorrect information in patient handout on effects of estrogen.患者手册中关于雌激素作用的信息有误。
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Sep 1;64(5):737-8.
10
Guiding lights.指引之光。
Nurs Times. 1999;95(38):28-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Development of an Educational Website for Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases Considering Immune Checkpoint Blockers: Usability and Acceptability Study.开发考虑免疫检查点抑制剂的癌症和既有自身免疫性疾病患者的教育网站：可用性和可接受性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Oct 25;10:e53443. doi: 10.2196/53443.
2
Evaluation of Online Written Medication Educational Resources for People Living With Heart Failure.针对心力衰竭患者的在线书面药物治疗教育资源评估
CJC Open. 2022 Jul 12;4(10):858-865. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.07.004. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Designing a Patient-Friendly Website for Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients with the Participatory Health Research Approach.采用参与式健康研究方法为新诊断癌症患者设计一个友好型患者网站。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1969. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041969.
4
Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials.患者教育材料的可读性和理解度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:725840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and validation of education materials to reduce childhood blindness due to retinopathy of prematurity.开发并验证用于减少早产儿视网膜病变所致儿童失明的教育材料。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Sep 30;10:342. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_687_20. eCollection 2021.
6
Information needs of people seeking fertility services in Canada: a mixed methods analysis.加拿大寻求生育服务人群的信息需求：一项混合方法分析。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Feb 11;9(1):104-127. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1879650.
7
Use of participatory action research approach to develop a self-management resource for persons living with dementia.运用参与式行动研究方法为痴呆症患者开发自我管理资源。
Dementia (London). 2021 Oct;20(7):2393-2411. doi: 10.1177/1471301221997281. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Evaluation of quality and readability of online patient information on osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment and recommendations for improvement.评估关于骨质疏松症和骨质疏松症药物治疗的在线患者信息的质量和可读性，并提出改进建议。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Aug;32(8):1567-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05800-7. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study.公众对骨质疏松症和骨折研究的重点：来自焦点小组研究的结果。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jun 16;15(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00766-9.
10
Improving Patient Education Materials: A Practical Algorithm from Development to Validation.改进患者教育材料：从开发到验证的实用算法
Curr Urol. 2019 Oct;13(2):64-69. doi: 10.1159/000499291. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
本文引用的文献
1
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.与患者的合作关系：共同临床决策的利弊
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112-21. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200209.
2
Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma.评估针对哮喘患者的全科医疗信息手册的可读性和准确性。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):264-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.264.
3
How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets.乳腺癌风险及筛查益处如何传达给女性：对58份宣传册的分析
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):263-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263.
4
Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.开发信息材料，向消费者展示技术评估的结果。英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）评审与传播中心的经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Winter;14(1):47-70. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300010527.
5
Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?评估互联网上的健康信息：是通向知识还是走向巴别塔？
JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611.
6
Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web.评论：衡量万维网的质量和影响
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879.
7
Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home.万维网上面向公众的健康信息的可靠性：关于儿童居家发热处理建议的系统调查
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875.
Zotero 插件