Halling V W, Jones M F, Bestrom J E, Wold A D, Rosenblatt J E, Smith T F, Cockerill F R
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3233-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.10.3233-3234.1999.
Recently, a treponema-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme immunoassay (EIA), the CAPTIA Syphilis-G (Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, N.Y.), has become available as a diagnostic test for syphilis. A total of 89 stored sera previously tested by the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) IgG assay were evaluated by the CAPTIA EIA. The FTA-ABS IgG procedure was performed by technologists unblinded to results of rapid plasmid reagin (RPR) testing of the same specimens. Borderline CAPTIA-positive samples (antibody indices of >/=0.650 and </=0.900) were retested; if the second analysis produced an index of >0.900, the sample was considered positive. Thirteen of 89 (15%) samples had discrepant results. Compared to the FTA-ABS assay, the CAPTIA EIA had a sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 70.7, 97.9, 96.7, and 79.7%, respectively. In another analysis, discrepancies between results were resolved by repeated FTA-ABS testing (technologists were blinded to previous RPR results) and patient chart reviews. Seven CAPTIA-negative samples which were previously interpreted (unblinded) as minimally reactive by the FTA method were subsequently interpreted (blinded) as nonreactive. One other discrepant sample (CAPTIA negative and FTA-ABS positive [at an intensity of 3+], unblinded) was FTA negative with repeated testing (blinded). For the five remaining discrepant samples, chart reviews indicated that one patient (CAPTIA negative and FTA-ABS positive [minimally reactive], blinded) had possible syphilis. These five samples were also evaluated and found to be negative by another treponema-specific test, the Treponema pallidum microhemagglutination assay. Therefore, after repeated testing and chart reviews, 2 of the 89 (2%) samples had discrepant results; the adjusted sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 96.7, 98.3, 96.7, and 98.3%, respectively. This study demonstrates that the CAPTIA IgG EIA is a reliable method for syphilis testing and that personnel performing tests which require subjective interpretation, like the FTA-ABS test, may be biased by RPR test results.
最近,一种针对梅毒螺旋体的免疫球蛋白G(IgG)酶免疫测定法(EIA),即CAPTIA梅毒-G检测(Trinity Biotech公司,纽约州詹姆斯敦),已作为梅毒诊断检测方法投入使用。通过CAPTIA EIA对89份先前用荧光梅毒螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-ABS)IgG检测法检测过的储存血清进行了评估。FTA-ABS IgG检测程序由对相同标本的快速血浆反应素(RPR)检测结果不设盲的技术人员进行。对CAPTIA检测呈临界阳性的样本(抗体指数≥0.650且≤0.900)进行重新检测;如果第二次分析得出的指数>0.900,则该样本被视为阳性。89份样本中有13份(15%)结果存在差异。与FTA-ABS检测法相比,CAPTIA EIA的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为70.7%、97.9%、96.7%和79.7%。在另一项分析中,通过重复FTA-ABS检测(技术人员对先前的RPR结果设盲)和查阅患者病历解决了结果差异问题。7份CAPTIA检测为阴性的样本,之前用FTA方法(未设盲)解读为最低反应性,随后(设盲)解读为无反应性。另一份有差异的样本(CAPTIA阴性且FTA-ABS阳性[强度为3+],未设盲)经重复检测(设盲)后FTA为阴性。对于其余5份有差异的样本,病历审查表明,有1名患者(CAPTIA阴性且FTA-ABS阳性[最低反应性],设盲)可能患有梅毒。对这5份样本也进行了评估,通过另一种针对梅毒螺旋体的检测方法梅毒螺旋体微量血凝试验发现它们均为阴性。因此,经过重复检测和病历审查,89份样本中有2份(2%)结果存在差异;调整后的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为96.7%、98.3%、96.7%和98.3%。本研究表明,CAPTIA IgG EIA是一种可靠的梅毒检测方法,并且像FTA-ABS检测这样需要主观解读的检测人员可能会受到RPR检测结果的影响。