Young H, Moyes A, Seagar L, McMillan A
Department of Medical Microbiology, Edinburgh University Medical School, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):913-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.913-917.1998.
Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is an ideal method for screening large numbers of patients for syphilis. We evaluated a novel immune-capture EIA (ICE Syphilis; Murex Diagnostics) that uses three recombinant Treponema pallidum antigens (TpN15, TpN17, and TpN47) and compared the results with those obtained by the native T. pallidum antigen EIA (Captia SelectSyph-G; Centocor) that we currently use for the serodiagnosis of syphilis. Specificity was evaluated by screening 1,184 unselected serum specimens in parallel by the ICE Syphilis and SelectSyph-G assays, while sensitivity was tested with a panel of 101 serum specimens containing antitreponemal antibodies (treated and untreated) from patients with various stages of infection. The specificity of the ICE Syphilis EIA (99.8%) on screening was significantly higher (P < 0.02) than that of the SelectSyph-G EIA (99.2%). The sensitivity of the ICE Syphilis EIA was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than that of the SelectSyph-G EIA on both initial (99 versus 91.4%) and repeat (100 versus 92.4%) testing. The ICE Syphilis EIA was also significantly more sensitive (P < 0.01) than the fluorescent treponemal antibody-abs (92.4%) but not the T. pallidum hemagglutination assay (97.1%). Sera containing antitreponemal antibodies gave a much higher antibody index (absorbance of test serum/kit cutoff) by the ICE Syphilis EIA than by the SelectSyph-G EIA. This combined with the overall high sensitivity makes the ICE Syphilis EIA an ideal test for excluding or detecting treponemal infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. The ICE Syphilis EIA was positive with sera from all 15 HIV-infected patients in the study, whereas sera from 3 HIV-infected patients were negative by the SelectSyph-G EIA. We conclude that the high sensitivity and specificity of the ICE Syphilis EIA and its suitability for automation make it an ideal screening test.
酶免疫测定(EIA)是筛查大量梅毒患者的理想方法。我们评估了一种新型免疫捕获EIA(ICE梅毒检测;Murex诊断公司),该检测使用三种重组梅毒螺旋体抗原(TpN15、TpN17和TpN47),并将结果与我们目前用于梅毒血清诊断的天然梅毒螺旋体抗原EIA(Captia SelectSyph - G;Centocor公司)所获得的结果进行比较。通过ICE梅毒检测和SelectSyph - G检测平行筛查1184份未经选择的血清标本评估特异性,而使用一组101份含有来自不同感染阶段患者抗梅毒螺旋体抗体(经处理和未经处理)的血清标本测试敏感性。ICE梅毒EIA在筛查时的特异性(99.8%)显著高于(P < 0.02)SelectSyph - G EIA(99.2%)。ICE梅毒EIA在初次检测(99%对91.4%)和重复检测(100%对92.4%)时的敏感性均显著高于(P < 0.01)SelectSyph - G EIA。ICE梅毒EIA也比荧光梅毒螺旋体抗体吸收试验(92.4%)显著更敏感(P < 0.01),但不比梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(97.1%)更敏感。含有抗梅毒螺旋体抗体的血清通过ICE梅毒EIA获得的抗体指数(检测血清吸光度/试剂盒临界值)比通过SelectSyph - G EIA高得多。这与总体高敏感性相结合,使得ICE梅毒EIA成为排除或检测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者梅毒螺旋体感染的理想检测方法。该研究中所有15例HIV感染患者的血清通过ICE梅毒EIA检测均为阳性,而3例HIV感染患者的血清通过SelectSyph - G EIA检测为阴性。我们得出结论,ICE梅毒EIA的高敏感性和特异性及其对自动化的适用性使其成为理想的筛查检测方法。