Suppr超能文献

中国和美国的内科医生遵循不同的道德标准。

Chinese and U.S. internists adhere to different ethical standards.

作者信息

Feldman M D, Zhang J, Cummings S R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0320, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Aug;14(8):469-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.06318.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether internists in the United States and China have different ideas and behaviors regarding informing patients of terminal diagnoses and HIV/AIDS, the role of the family in end-of-life decision making, and assisted suicide.

DESIGN

Structured questionnaire of clinical vignettes followed by multiple choice questions.

SETTING

University and community hospitals in San Francisco and Beijing, China.

SUBJECTS

Forty practicing internists were interviewed, 20 in China and 20 in the United States.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the internists surveyed, 95% of the U.S. internists and none of the Chinese internists would inform a patient with cancer of her diagnosis. However, 100% of U.S. and 90% of Chinese internists would tell a terminally ill patient who had AIDS, rather than advanced cancer, about his diagnosis. When family members' wishes conflicted with a patient's preferences regarding chemotherapy of advanced cancer, Chinese internists were more likely to follow the family's preferences rather than the patient's preferences (65%) than were the U.S. internists (5%). Thirty percent of U.S. internists and 15% of Chinese internists agreed with a terminally ill patient's request for sufficient narcotics to end her life.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant differences in clinical ethical beliefs between internists in the United States and China, most evident in informing patients of a cancer diagnosis. In general, the Chinese physicians appeared to give far greater weight to family preferences in medical decision making than did the U.S. physicians.

摘要

目的

确定美国和中国的内科医生在告知患者终末期诊断及艾滋病病毒/艾滋病、家庭在临终决策中的作用以及协助自杀方面是否存在不同的观念和行为。

设计

采用临床病例 vignettes 的结构化问卷,随后是多项选择题。

地点

美国旧金山和中国北京的大学及社区医院。

研究对象

对 40 名执业内科医生进行了访谈,其中 20 名来自中国,20 名来自美国。

测量指标及主要结果

在接受调查的内科医生中,95%的美国内科医生会告知癌症患者其诊断结果,而中国内科医生无人会这样做。然而,100%的美国内科医生和 90%的中国内科医生会告知患有艾滋病而非晚期癌症的绝症患者其诊断结果。当家庭成员的意愿与患者对晚期癌症化疗的偏好相冲突时,中国内科医生比美国内科医生更有可能遵循家庭的偏好而非患者的偏好(65%对 5%)。30%的美国内科医生和 15%的中国内科医生同意绝症患者使用足够的麻醉剂结束生命的请求。

结论

我们发现美国和中国的内科医生在临床伦理观念上存在显著差异,在告知患者癌症诊断方面最为明显。总体而言,中国医生在医疗决策中似乎比美国医生更重视家庭的偏好。

相似文献

1
Chinese and U.S. internists adhere to different ethical standards.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Aug;14(8):469-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.06318.x.
3
Negotiating end-of-life decision making: a comparison of Japanese and U.S. residents' approaches.
Acad Med. 2005 Jul;80(7):617-21. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00003.
4
Attitudes and practices of U.S. oncologists regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 3;133(7):527-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-7-200010030-00011.
6
Physicians' beliefs and attitudes about end-of-life care: a comparison of selected regions in Hungary and the United States.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.019. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
7
A national survey of U.S. internists' experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21238.x.
8
Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):225-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019638.

引用本文的文献

2
Conspiracy of Silence in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;12(7):214. doi: 10.3390/dj12070214.
3
Advance directives and end-of-life care preferences among adults in Wuhan, China: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):2042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12046-3.
4
Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative.
Account Res. 2022 Jul;29(5):294-308. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1920014. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Developing a bioethics curriculum for medical students from divergent geo-political regions.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 27;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0711-4.
6
Palliative sedation for terminally ill cancer patients in a tertiary cancer center in Shanghai, China.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Mar 15;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0002-6. eCollection 2015.
7
Self-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a racially diverse, low-income study population.
J Community Health. 2013 Apr;38(2):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9612-6.
8
Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study.
J R Soc Med. 2012 Apr;105(4):157-65. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110256. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Attitudes towards ethical problems in critical care medicine: the Chinese perspective.
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Apr;37(4):655-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2124-x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
10
Physician beliefs and practice regarding end-of-life care in India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;12(3):109-15. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.43679.

本文引用的文献

1
What has bioethics to offer the developing countries.
Bioethics. 1993 Apr;7(2-3):108-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00277.x.
2
Morality in flux: medical ethics dilemmas in the People's Republic of China.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Mar;1(1):16-27. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0056.
4
The ethics of euthanasia--attitudes and practice among Norwegian physicians.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Sep;45(6):887-92. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00430-3.
7
Physicians' attitudes about the care of patients in the persistent vegetative state: a national survey.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 15;125(2):104-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-2-199607150-00004.
8
A survey of Japanese physicians' attitudes and practice in caring for terminally ill cancer patients.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Mar;49(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1995.tb01857.x.
9
Communication between patients and physicians about terminal care: a survey in Japan.
Soc Sci Med. 1993 May;36(9):1151-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90235-v.
10
What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients?
Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):473-6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90218-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验