Newberne P, Smith R L, Doull J, Goodman J I, Munro I C, Portoghese P S, Wagner B M, Weil C S, Woods L A, Adams T B, Lucas C D, Ford R A
Department of Pathology, Boston University, School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA.
Food Chem Toxicol. 1999 Jul;37(7):789-811. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00037-x.
This publication is the fourth in a series of safety evaluations performed by the Expert Panel of the Flavour and Extract Manufacturers' Association (FEMA). In 1993, the Panel initiated a comprehensive program to re-evaluate the safety of more than 1700 GRAS flavouring substances under conditions of intended use. In this review, scientific data relevant to the safety evaluation of trans-anethole (i.e. 4-methoxypropenylbenzene) as a flavouring substance is critically evaluated by the FEMA Expert Panel. The evaluation uses a mechanism-based approach in which production of the hepatotoxic metabolite anethole epoxide (AE) is used to interpret the pathological changes observed in different species and sexes of laboratory rodents in chronic and subchronic dietary studies. Female Sprague Dawley rats metabolize more trans-anethole to AE than mice or humans and, therefore, are the most conservative model for evaluating the potential for AE-induced hepatotoxicity in humans exposed to trans-anethole from use as a flavouring substance. At low levels of exposure, trans-anethole is efficiently detoxicated in rodents and humans primarily by O-demethylation and omega-oxidation, respectively, while epoxidation is only a minor pathway. At high dose levels in rats, particularly females, a metabolic shift occurs resulting in increased epoxidation and formation of AE. Lower activity of the "fast" acting detoxication enzyme epoxide hydrolase in the female is associated with more pronounced hepatotoxicity compared to that in the male. The continuous intake of high dose levels of trans-anethole (i.e. cumulative exposure) has been shown in dietary studies to induce a continuum of cytotoxicity, cell necrosis and cell proliferation. In chronic dietary studies in rats, hepatotoxicity was observed when the estimated daily hepatic production of AE exceeded 30 mg AE/kg body weight. In female rats, chronic hepatotoxicity and a low incidence of liver tumours were reported at a dietary intake of 550 mg trans-anethole/kg body weight/day. Under these conditions, daily hepatic production of AE exceeded 120 mg/kg body weight. Additionally, neither trans-anethole nor AE show any evidence of genotoxicity. Therefore, the weight of evidence supports the conclusion that hepatocarcinogenic effects in the female rat occur via a non-genotoxic mechanism and are secondary to hepatotoxicity caused by continuous exposure to high hepatocellular concentrations of AE. trans-Anethole was reaffirmed as GRAS (GRASr) based on (1) its low level of flavour intake (54 microg/kg body weight/day); (2) its metabolic detoxication pathway in humans at levels of exposure from use as a flavouring substance; (3) the lack of mutagenic or genotoxic potential; (4) the NOAEL of 120 mg trans-anethole/kg body weight/day in the female rat reported in a 2 + -year study which produces a level of AE (i.e. 22 mg AE/kg body weight/day) at least 10,000 times the level (0.002 mg AE/kg body weight day) produced from the intake of trans-anethole from use as a flavouring substance; and (5) the conclusion that a slight increase in the incidence of hepatocellular tumours in the high dose group (550 mg trans-anethole/kg body weight/day) of female rats was the only significant neoplastic finding in a 2+ -year dietary study. This finding is concluded to be secondary to hepatotoxicity induced by high hepatocellular concentrations of AE generated under conditions of the study. Because trans-anethole undergoes efficient metabolic detoxication in humans at low levels of exposure, the neoplastic effects in rats associated with dose-dependent hepatotoxicity are not indicative of any significant risk to human health from the use of trans-anethole as a flavouring substance.
本出版物是风味和提取物制造商协会(FEMA)专家小组进行的一系列安全性评估中的第四份。1993年,该小组启动了一项全面计划,以重新评估1700多种公认安全(GRAS)调味物质在预期使用条件下的安全性。在本次审查中,FEMA专家小组对与反式茴香脑(即4-甲氧基丙烯基苯)作为调味物质安全性评估相关的科学数据进行了严格评估。该评估采用基于机制的方法,其中利用肝毒性代谢物茴香脑环氧化物(AE)的产生来解释在慢性和亚慢性饮食研究中不同物种和性别的实验啮齿动物中观察到的病理变化。雌性斯普拉格-道利大鼠比小鼠或人类将更多的反式茴香脑代谢为AE,因此,是评估因使用调味物质而接触反式茴香脑的人类中AE诱导肝毒性可能性的最保守模型。在低暴露水平下,反式茴香脑在啮齿动物和人类中分别主要通过O-去甲基化和ω-氧化有效地解毒,而环氧化只是一条次要途径。在大鼠高剂量水平下,特别是雌性大鼠,会发生代谢转变,导致环氧化增加和AE形成。与雄性相比,雌性中“快速”作用的解毒酶环氧化物水解酶活性较低,与更明显的肝毒性相关。饮食研究表明,持续摄入高剂量水平的反式茴香脑(即累积暴露)会导致一系列细胞毒性、细胞坏死和细胞增殖。在大鼠慢性饮食研究中,当估计每日肝脏中AE的产生量超过30 mg AE/kg体重时,观察到肝毒性。在雌性大鼠中,当饮食摄入量为550 mg反式茴香脑/kg体重/天时,报告有慢性肝毒性和低发生率的肝肿瘤。在这些条件下,每日肝脏中AE的产生量超过120 mg/kg体重。此外,反式茴香脑和AE均未显示出任何遗传毒性证据。因此,证据权重支持以下结论:雌性大鼠中的肝癌致癌作用通过非遗传毒性机制发生,并且是连续暴露于高肝细胞浓度的AE所引起的肝毒性的继发结果。反式茴香脑基于以下几点被重新确认为GRAS(GRASr):(1)其低水平的风味摄入量(54微克/千克体重/天);(2)在作为调味物质使用的暴露水平下其在人体中的代谢解毒途径;(3)缺乏诱变或遗传毒性潜力;(4)在一项2年以上研究中报告的雌性大鼠中反式茴香脑的无观察到有害作用水平(NOAEL)为120 mg反式茴香脑/千克体重/天,该水平产生的AE水平(即22 mg AE/千克体重/天)至少是因使用调味物质摄入反式茴香脑所产生水平(0.002 mg AE/千克体重/天)的10000倍;(5)在一项2年以上饮食研究中,高剂量组(550 mg反式茴香脑/千克体重/天)雌性大鼠肝细胞肿瘤发生率略有增加是唯一显著的肿瘤学发现这一结论。该发现被认为是研究条件下高肝细胞浓度的AE诱导的肝毒性的继发结果。由于反式茴香脑在低暴露水平下在人体中会进行有效的代谢解毒,因此大鼠中与剂量依赖性肝毒性相关的肿瘤效应并不表明使用反式茴香脑作为调味物质对人类健康有任何重大风险。