Cardol M, de Haan R J, van den Bos G A, de Jong B A, de Groot I J
Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 1999 Oct;13(5):411-9. doi: 10.1191/026921599668601325.
To report on the feasibility and psychometric properties in terms of homogeneity and construct validity of a newly developed handicap questionnaire focusing on person-perceived handicaps: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA).
Cross-sectional. SETTING, subjects and outcome measure: One hundred consecutive individuals from the outpatient clinic of the department of rehabilitation of an academic hospital administered the new questionnaire IPA.
The results show good homogeneity and construct validity of the IPA. Factor analysis showed that the scale consists of four factors, explaining 68% of the total variance: social relationships, autonomy in self-care, mobility and leisure, and family role. Homogeneity of the four subscales was considered good, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.84 (family role) to 0.87 (social relationships). Feasibility in terms of the number of missing values and administration time needed was satisfactory.
The first results suggest that the IPA promises to be a useful handicap questionnaire. Further research is needed to establish test-retest reliability, convergent validity and responsiveness to change.
报告一份新开发的关注个人感知障碍的残疾问卷——《参与和自主能力影响问卷》(IPA)在同质性和结构效度方面的可行性及心理测量特性。
横断面研究。设置、研究对象及结果测量:来自一所学术医院康复科门诊的100名连续就诊个体接受了新问卷IPA的测试。
结果显示IPA具有良好的同质性和结构效度。因子分析表明该量表由四个因子组成,解释了总方差的68%:社会关系、自我照顾自主性、活动与休闲以及家庭角色。四个子量表的同质性良好,克朗巴哈系数范围从0.84(家庭角色)到0.87(社会关系)。在缺失值数量和所需施测时间方面的可行性令人满意。
初步结果表明IPA有望成为一份有用的残疾问卷。需要进一步研究以确定重测信度、收敛效度以及对变化的反应性。