Dulguerov P, Marchal F, Wang D, Gysin C
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland.
Am J Otol. 1999 Sep;20(5):672-8.
This study is a critical review of the described methods for objective topographic evaluation of facial nerve function to identify areas of consensus and point to future research topics. SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Original research articles on the subject were identified through the Medline database and reference cross-checking.
The articles were grouped according to the methodology used for topographic facial nerve evaluation. The advantages and shortcomings of each method are evaluated. The results obtained in each publication are presented in light of the method used.
Measurements localized around the facial area under investigation show maximal displacement, whereas other sites exhibit much smaller displacements. Large displacements in these locations can be used to assess synkinesis and contractures. Large intersubject variability of the same measure is found. Both linear measurement and image-subtracting techniques hold promise. but until comparative studies are performed, the best method will remain controversial. Simple systems, accurately evaluating facial motor function, are yet to be developed.
本研究是对面神经功能客观地形图评估所描述方法的批判性综述,以确定共识领域并指出未来研究主题。资料来源与研究选择:通过Medline数据库和参考文献交叉核对确定了关于该主题的原始研究文章。
文章根据用于面神经地形图评估的方法进行分组。评估了每种方法的优缺点。根据所使用的方法呈现了每个出版物中获得的结果。
在所研究的面部区域周围进行的测量显示出最大位移,而其他部位的位移则小得多。这些部位的大位移可用于评估联带运动和挛缩。发现同一测量指标在受试者之间存在很大差异。线性测量和图像减法技术都有前景。但在进行比较研究之前,最佳方法仍存在争议。尚未开发出能准确评估面部运动功能的简单系统。