Suppr超能文献

另一种面瘫评估量表?ADS量表:我们的提议及使用方法。

Another Scale for the Assessment of Facial Paralysis? ADS Scale: Our Proposition, How to Use It.

作者信息

Di Stadio Arianna

机构信息

PhD, ENT and FPRS, MEEI Hospital Otology Lab Boston Harvard University.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):MC08-11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15366.6953. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several authors in the years propose different methods to evaluate areas and specific movement's disease in patient affected by facial palsy. Despite these efforts the House Brackmann is anyway the most used assessment in medical community.

AIM

The aims of our study is the proposition and assessing a new rating Arianna Disease Scale (ADS) for the clinical evaluation of facial paralysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients affected by unilateral facial Bell paralysis were enrolled in a prospective study from 2012 to 2014. Their facial nerve function was evaluated with our assessment analysing facial district divided in upper, middle and lower third. We analysed different facial expressions. Each movement corresponded to the action of different muscles. The action of each muscle was scored from 0 to 1, with 0 corresponding from complete flaccid paralysis to muscle's normal function ending with a score of 1. Synkinesis was considered and evaluated also in the scale with a fixed 0.5 score. Our results considered ease and speed of evaluation of the assessment, the accuracy of muscle deficit and the ability to calculate synkinesis using a score.

RESULTS

All the three observers agreed 100% in the highest degree of deficit. We found some discrepancies in intermediate score with 92% agreement in upper face, 87% in middle and 80% in lower face, where there were more muscles involved in movements.

CONCLUSION

Our scale had some limitations linked to the small group of patients evaluated and we had a little difficulty understanding the intermediate score of 0.3 and 0.7. However, this was an accurate tool to quickly evaluate facial nerve function. This has potential as an alternative scale to and to diagnose facial nerve disorders.

摘要

引言

多年来,多位作者提出了不同的方法来评估面瘫患者的面部区域和特定运动障碍。尽管做出了这些努力,但House - Brackmann评估法仍是医学界最常用的评估方法。

目的

我们研究的目的是提出并评估一种用于面瘫临床评估的新评分系统——阿丽亚娜疾病量表(ADS)。

材料与方法

2012年至2014年,60例单侧贝尔面瘫患者被纳入一项前瞻性研究。通过我们的评估方法,将面部区域分为上、中、下三部分来评估他们的面神经功能。我们分析了不同的面部表情。每个动作对应不同肌肉的活动。每块肌肉的活动从0到1进行评分,0表示完全松弛性麻痹,1表示肌肉正常功能。该量表中也考虑并评估了联带运动,固定评分为0.5。我们的结果考虑了评估的难易程度和速度、肌肉功能缺损的准确性以及使用评分计算联带运动的能力。

结果

所有三位观察者在最高程度的功能缺损上达成了100%的一致。我们发现在中间评分上存在一些差异,在上半面部的一致性为92%,中部为87%,下半面部为80%,下半面部参与运动的肌肉更多。

结论

我们的量表存在一些局限性,与所评估的患者群体较小有关,并且我们在理解0.3和0.7的中间评分时遇到了一些困难。然而,这是一种快速评估面神经功能的准确工具。它有潜力作为一种替代量表用于诊断面神经疾病。

相似文献

4
Validation of the Spanish version of the Electronic Facial Palsy Assessment (eFACE).电子面瘫评估(eFACE)西班牙语版的验证。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):673-682. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08132-4. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
8
Validation of the Spanish version of the Sunnybrook facial grading system.桑尼布鲁克面部分级系统西班牙语版本的验证
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb;280(2):543-548. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07484-7. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

3
Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0.面神经分级系统2.0
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr;140(4):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.031.
9
Facial nerve grading system.面神经分级系统。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985 Apr;93(2):146-7. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300202.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验