Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性随机研究。

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

J Urol. 1999 Dec;162(6):1909-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68066-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We performed a prospective randomized study to determine appropriate first line treatment for distal ureteral stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 1996 and October 1997, 80 patients with distal ureteral stones (40 smaller than 5 mm. and 40 larger than 5 mm.) were randomized and treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy with a 9.5 or 6.5F semirigid ureteroscope.

RESULTS

Ureteroscopy was significantly better in terms of operative time, fluoroscopy time and time to achieve a stone-free state. The smaller the stones, the greater the difference between the 2 treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

For distal ureteral stones we recommend ureteroscopy as first line treatment.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定输尿管下段结石的合适一线治疗方法。

材料与方法

在1996年1月至1997年10月期间,80例输尿管下段结石患者(40例结石小于5毫米,40例结石大于5毫米)被随机分组,分别接受体外冲击波碎石术或使用9.5F或6.5F半硬性输尿管镜进行输尿管镜检查。

结果

在手术时间、透视时间和达到无结石状态的时间方面,输尿管镜检查明显更优。结石越小,两种治疗方式之间的差异越大。

结论

对于输尿管下段结石,我们推荐输尿管镜检查作为一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验