Wu A H
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Dec;107 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):873-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s6873.
It is now recognized that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace and other settings outside the home may be equally as important as residential ETS exposure. This review examines the sources of misclassification in the assessment of workplace ETS exposure in questionnaire-based epidemiologic studies. Cogent to this discussion is the role of misclassification of ever smokers as never smokers, which is important in studies of both workplace and residential ETS exposure and lung cancer and is discussed first. The collective evidence from studies that have used direct or indirect approaches to estimate smoker misclassification shows that although some misclassification of ever smokers as never smokers exists in studies of ETS and lung cancer, the potential bias from the misclassification of smokers is unlikely to explain the observed increased risk of lung cancer associated with ETS exposure.
现在人们认识到,在工作场所及家庭以外的其他环境中接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)可能与在家中接触ETS同样重要。本综述探讨了在基于问卷的流行病学研究中评估工作场所ETS暴露时错误分类的来源。与本讨论相关的是将曾经吸烟者误分类为从不吸烟者的情况,这在工作场所和家庭ETS暴露及肺癌研究中都很重要,将首先进行讨论。那些使用直接或间接方法估计吸烟者错误分类的研究的综合证据表明,虽然在ETS与肺癌的研究中存在一些将曾经吸烟者误分类为从不吸烟者的情况,但吸烟者错误分类导致的潜在偏差不太可能解释观察到的与ETS暴露相关的肺癌风险增加。