Legros D, Paquet C, Perea W, Marty I, Mugisha N K, Royer H, Neira M, Ivanoff B
Epicentre, Kampala, Uganda.
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(10):837-42.
In refugee settings, the use of cholera vaccines is controversial since a mass vaccination campaign might disrupt other priority interventions. We therefore conducted a study to assess the feasibility of such a campaign using a two-dose oral cholera vaccine in a refugee camp. The campaign, using killed whole-cell/recombinant B-subunit cholera vaccine, was carried out in October 1997 among 44,000 south Sudanese refugees in Uganda. Outcome variables included the number of doses administered, the drop-out rate between the two rounds, the proportion of vaccine wasted, the speed of administration, the cost of the campaign, and the vaccine coverage. Overall, 63,220 doses of vaccine were administered. At best, 200 vaccine doses were administered per vaccination site and per hour. The direct cost of the campaign amounted to US$ 14,655, not including the vaccine itself. Vaccine coverage, based on vaccination cards, was 83.0% and 75.9% for the first and second rounds, respectively. Mass vaccination of a large refugee population with an oral cholera vaccine therefore proved to be feasible. A pre-emptive vaccination strategy could be considered in stable refugee settings and in urban slums in high-risk areas. However, the potential cost of the vaccine and the absence of quickly accessible stockpiles are major drawbacks for its large-scale use.
在难民环境中,霍乱疫苗的使用存在争议,因为大规模疫苗接种运动可能会干扰其他优先干预措施。因此,我们开展了一项研究,以评估在难民营中使用两剂口服霍乱疫苗开展此类运动的可行性。1997年10月,在乌干达的44000名南苏丹难民中开展了使用灭活全细胞/重组B亚单位霍乱疫苗的运动。结果变量包括接种剂量数、两轮接种之间的退出率、疫苗浪费比例、接种速度、运动成本以及疫苗接种覆盖率。总体而言,共接种了63220剂疫苗。每个接种点每小时最多接种200剂疫苗。该运动的直接成本达14655美元,不包括疫苗本身。根据接种卡计算,第一轮和第二轮的疫苗接种覆盖率分别为83.0%和75.9%。因此,事实证明,对大量难民群体进行口服霍乱疫苗大规模接种是可行的。在稳定的难民营环境以及高风险地区的城市贫民窟中,可以考虑采取预防性疫苗接种策略。然而,疫苗的潜在成本以及缺乏可快速获取的储备是其大规模使用的主要障碍。