Gardiner J M, Ramponi C, Richardson-Klavehn A
City University, London, United Kingdom.
Conscious Cogn. 1999 Dec;8(4):484-96. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1999.0409.
Level of processing and generation effects were replicated in separate experiments in which recognition memory was tested using either short (500 ms) or long (1500 ms) response deadlines. These effects were similar at each deadline. Moreover, at each deadline these effects were associated with subsequent reports of remembering, not of knowing. And reports of both knowing and remembering increased following the longer deadline. These results imply that knowing does not index an automatic familiarity process, as conceived in some dual-process models of recognition, and that both remembering and knowing increase with the slower, more controlled processing permitted by the longer response time.
