Louhevaara Veikko
a Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 1995 Jan;1(2):144-152. doi: 10.1080/10803548.1995.11076311.
The aim of this article is to introduce a set of work physiology methods for the assessment of physical load at the work site and to consider (a) their relevance for different types of muscular work, and (b) their feasibility for occupational health and safety practitioners. The results of an ergonomic intervention study for the reduction of workload associated with various manual materials handling tasks were used for the evaluation of the feasibility and sensitivity of the measurements of heart rate, the Edholm and OWAS methods, and the ratings of overall and local perceived exertion. The methods proved feasible, although time consuming, and their sensitivity for the quantification of small changes in physical workload was limited. Despite these shortcomings, these methods can be used by occupational health and safety practitioners when their strategy and data collection techniques are developed further. In conclusion, there are relevant and feasible methods fora reliable work-site assessment of cardiorespiratory and postural load related to the activation of large muscle masses. On the other hand, field methods for the quantification of local static workload and repetitive type of workload with small muscle masses are scarce.
本文旨在介绍一套用于评估工作场所体力负荷的劳动生理学方法,并探讨(a)这些方法与不同类型肌肉工作的相关性,以及(b)它们对职业健康与安全从业者的可行性。一项关于减少与各种手工物料搬运任务相关工作量的人体工程学干预研究结果,被用于评估心率测量、埃德霍姆法和OWAS法以及整体和局部自觉用力评分的可行性和敏感性。这些方法虽然耗时,但证明是可行的,并且它们量化体力工作量微小变化的敏感性有限。尽管存在这些缺点,但当职业健康与安全从业者进一步完善其策略和数据收集技术时,这些方法仍可被他们使用。总之,存在相关且可行的方法来可靠地评估与大肌肉群激活相关的心肺和姿势负荷的工作场所情况。另一方面,用于量化局部静态工作量和小肌肉群重复类型工作量的现场方法却很少。