Séguin J R, Boulerice B, Harden P W, Tremblay R E, Pihl R O
Research Unit on Childhood Psychosocial Maladjustment, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;40(8):1197-208.
This study examined the role of ADHD in the association between physical aggression and two types of executive functions. Boys received a cognitive-neuropsychological test battery over the ages of 13, 14, and 15 years. Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.25) data were collected from the boys and one parent between ages 14 and 16, and an IQ estimate was obtained at age 15. Three groups, differing in stability and level of physical aggression since kindergarten, were formed: Stable Aggressive, Unstable Aggressive, and Non-aggressive. Composite scores of validated executive function tests of working memory representing subjective ordering and conditional association learning were formed. A MANCOVA (N = 149) using ADHD status, teacher-rated negative emotionality, general memory abilities, and IQ as covariates was performed on the two composite scores. ADHD and teacher-rated emotionality did not provide significant adjustment to the dependent variables. Number of ADHD symptoms was negatively associated only with general memory and IQ. General memory contributed significantly to adjusting for conditional association test scores. Group differences indicated lower conditional association scores for Unstable Aggressive boys relative to the other groups. Both IQ and general memory abilities interacted with subjective ordering within the groups. Specifically, Stable Aggressive boys performed poorly on this measure and did not benefit from increases in IQ whereas Nonaggressive boys performed best and were not disadvantaged by lower general memory abilities. This suggests a relationship exists between aspects of working memory and a history of physical aggression regardless of ADHD and IQ.
本研究考察了注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在身体攻击行为与两种执行功能之间关联中的作用。男孩们在13、14和15岁时接受了一系列认知神经心理学测试。在14至16岁期间收集了男孩及其一位家长的儿童诊断访谈量表(DISC 2.25)数据,并在15岁时获得了智商估计值。根据自幼儿园以来身体攻击行为的稳定性和程度,将男孩分为三组:稳定攻击型、不稳定攻击型和非攻击型。形成了代表主观排序和条件关联学习的工作记忆有效执行功能测试的综合分数。对这两个综合分数进行了多变量协方差分析(N = 149),将ADHD状态、教师评定的负面情绪、一般记忆能力和智商作为协变量。ADHD和教师评定的情绪对因变量没有显著的调整作用。ADHD症状的数量仅与一般记忆和智商呈负相关。一般记忆对调整条件关联测试分数有显著贡献。组间差异表明,不稳定攻击型男孩的条件关联分数相对于其他组较低。智商和一般记忆能力在组内均与主观排序存在交互作用。具体而言,稳定攻击型男孩在该测量上表现较差,且未从智商提高中受益,而非攻击型男孩表现最佳,且未因一般记忆能力较低而处于劣势。这表明,无论ADHD和智商如何,工作记忆的各个方面与身体攻击行为史之间存在关联。